Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  
Author: Subject: Glowing tomato
garage chemist
chemical wizard
*****




Posts: 1803
Registered: 16-8-2004
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 15:52
Glowing tomato


http://www.metacafe.com/watch/757249/make_a_glowing_tomato/

How the hell does that work? That seems like a really weird concontion of chemicals: matchheads, bleach and hydrogen peroxide.
I first thought "singlet oxygen", but the glow is way too strong and too long for that. Also, no oxygen seems to be evolved.

The UV detection of "high-phosphorus matchsticks" is also bullshit, as phosphorus does not fluorescence under UV light- white phos glows in the dark, but by itself and is consumed in the process.

Also, which of the two layers are they withdrawing with the syringe?




www.versuchschemie.de
Das aktivste deutsche Chemieforum!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Eclectic
National Hazard
****




Posts: 899
Registered: 14-11-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: Obsessive

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 16:06


The matches may be irrelevant, unless chlorates or chlorites help the reaction along:

http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/12/09/firefly-chemistry/
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ozone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1269
Registered: 28-7-2005
Location: Good Olde USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Integrated

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 16:21


Quite cool, if it works. IIRC strike anywhere matches contain antimony (III) sulfide, RP, K chlorate and powdered glass. Of interest is the luminous nature of the intermediate "oxidized" match compound (and the two layers, of which it looks like the clear top that they are using). This evokes a very small amount of white P (does look like WP glow), but evolution of white P from red is a physical (phase transition) rather than a chemical process. Is the bleach treatment exothermic?

Hmm. The thing does not appear to smoke or steam when cut and exposed to air whilst aglow. IT also appears cool enough to handle comfortably. Hmm. Sb oxychloride?, KClO3 should remain as is (maybe some NaClO3 is formed, definitely if there is any bleach left in the mix and H2O2 is added---NaOCl will oxidize H2O2 to yield O2 (likely some 1Dg singlet O2) NaCl and traces of NaClO3, but this rxn is frisky and no evidence of gas evolution was seen). POCl3? Complex phosphorus-peroxide species? wierd.

I'll have to try it out (I'll have to buy these matches first. Maybe making match compound would be easier and work a bit better).

Definitely on my to-do list,

O3




-Anyone who never made a mistake never tried anything new.
--Albert Einstein
View user's profile View All Posts By User
BromicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3227
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline

Mood: Rock n' Roll

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 16:32


When they start putting the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in it looks like there is a very fast gas evolution, all around the syringe it looks like bubbles are coming out of different parts of the tomato (might just be an effect of having a bunch of liquid forced into a tomato though). My first guess would be the hypochlorite reacting with the peroxide (They didn't say the concentration as far as I noticed), that emits a red light that would compliment the tomato and something in there might be acting as a sensitizer thereby allowing for a good light emission.

When I was researching compositions of match heads I couldn't find any modern manufacturers using red phosphorus in the heads themselves. Most seemed to use phosphorous sesquisulfide or just some mixture of phosphorus sulfides. If the NaOCl isn't the main culprit here I would place some of the activity on that but there is also the chlorate in the mix there. Before they added the peroxide I thought maybe the hypochlorite/chlorate mixture being acidified slowly by the natural juices of the tomato might facilitate a nice chemiluminescent reaction with the phosphorus sulfides. But then again there are a lot of factors that could come into play here. Although this would seem to be an easy experiment to test out in a lab in that there are only a few key 'ingredients' that I can pin point in the reaction.




Shamelessly plugging my attempts at writing fiction: http://www.robvincent.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
guy
National Hazard
****




Posts: 982
Registered: 14-4-2004
Location: California, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Catalytic!

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 16:57


Singlet oxygen rapidly oxidizing white phosphorous.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ozone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1269
Registered: 28-7-2005
Location: Good Olde USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Integrated

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 17:00


Forgot about the sesquisulfide in modern compositions. I do know that we will get some singlet O2 when NaOCl oxidizes H2O2. At first I thought this rxn would be too fast for a persistent chemiluminescence. However, now that I think a bit more about it, the tomato flesh is likely limiting mass transfer to diffusion (hence gradual emission) AND the stability of the H2O2 will be affected by the lower pH creating hydroperoxide intermediates (peracids, etc.) which will have much longer lifetimes at the relatively low temperatures employed (rt).

So, perhaps we get some singlet O2 with time release, in the presence of an activator some decent fluorophore and away we go.

I do think that the pH and rate of reaction allowed by mechanical stricture are main factors which make the NaOCl/H2O2 system slow enough to perhaps work.

Unexplained, however, is the phosphorescence (triplet) of the intermediate NaOCl product. Could the sulfides be oxidized from the P to yield maybe, HSO3, chlorosulfonic acid (and who knows what all else) and P (maybe white)? Hmm. Let me look around and see If I have any matches. First I'll try bleach and H2O2 (at 2.5 and 3%, respectively, in the dark).

Cheers,

O3

[Edited on 9-8-2007 by Ozone]




-Anyone who never made a mistake never tried anything new.
--Albert Einstein
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ozone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1269
Registered: 28-7-2005
Location: Good Olde USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Integrated

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 17:24


NaOCl and H2O2, do not provide any visible light (just effervescence and heat). Likewise with the same test with a small amount of added luminous paint. [edit] this was to test if UV was emitted; it would have glowed much more brightly--it's luminosity remained unchanged in the presence of reacting NaOCl and H2O2.

I though I might bave tomato juice, but I found only fruit flavored V8:P.

For tomorrow, i wouild like to get some benzophenone, Na fluorescein, matches, RP (maybe), stronger peroxide...and...a tomato. Maybe we can test-tube-it-out.

[edit] I do have lycopene and folic acid, for the hell of it.

Cheers,

O3

[Edited on 10-8-2007 by Ozone]




-Anyone who never made a mistake never tried anything new.
--Albert Einstein
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DerAlte
National Hazard
****




Posts: 779
Registered: 14-5-2007
Location: Erehwon
Member Is Offline

Mood: Disgusted

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 17:34


Lycopene in the tomato? Think of all those conjugated double bonds gradually going pop, pop, pop!

Regards,

Der Alte
View user's profile View All Posts By User
jimmyboy
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 235
Registered: 1-3-2004
Location: Texas
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 18:52


The glowing tomato is hogwash -- matches have Red P not White -- which doesn't glow unless its converted with a good amount of heat -- neither peroxide or a bleach solution will do this - hypochlorite and peroxide does glow faintly but not like that... the tomato was glowing like a light bulb -- what it really looked like is he either used phosphorescent dye and a blacklight or a tiny LED to do this trick... its entertaining to be fooled i guess.. maybe he will make another 100 bucks on metacafe..

[Edited on 10-8-2007 by jimmyboy]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Eclectic
National Hazard
****




Posts: 899
Registered: 14-11-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: Obsessive

[*] posted on 9-8-2007 at 19:19


Hey! Did ANYONE read the link I posted?

Again:

http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/12/09/firefly-chemistry/

[Edited on 8-9-2007 by Eclectic]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
YT2095
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1091
Registered: 31-5-2003
Location: Just left of Europe and down a bit.
Member Is Offline

Mood: within Nominal Parameters

[*] posted on 10-8-2007 at 01:27


I have and am wondering if things like Rhodamine B or 6G would work instead of some of the other items like Chili powder and the likes.

I also have something called Optical Brightener, it looks like 3in1 oil, but in water it glows blue under UV but doesn`t have a color itself.

Nice link Eclectic, Thanks :)




\"In a world full of wonders mankind has managed to invent boredom\" - Death
Twinkies don\'t have a shelf life. They have a half-life! -Caine (a friend of mine)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Xenoid
National Hazard
****




Posts: 775
Registered: 14-6-2007
Location: Springs Junction, New Zealand
Member Is Offline

Mood: Comfortably Numb

[*] posted on 10-8-2007 at 03:20


Quote:
Originally posted by Eclectic
Hey! Did ANYONE read the link I posted?


Yeah! Great site! There is some fantastic "stuff" there!

I wonder how an article titled " Fun with explosive gases for the home chemist " would fare in these times of paranoia.

Xenoid

[Edited on 10-8-2007 by Xenoid]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Eclectic
National Hazard
****




Posts: 899
Registered: 14-11-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: Obsessive

[*] posted on 10-8-2007 at 04:21


It's just that the 1930's article on chemiluminescence may explain what's going on with the bleach, peroxide, and tomato...

Do the chemicals in the matches actually make any difference?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemkid
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 269
Registered: 5-4-2007
Location: Suburban Hell
Member Is Offline

Mood: polarized

[*] posted on 10-8-2007 at 07:49


I happen to have a long wave UV light and i checked the different boxes of safety matches only one of which luminesced, but it was bright orange. I am yet to try strike anywhere matches.

Chemkid

[Edited on 10-8-2007 by chemkid]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Xenoid
National Hazard
****




Posts: 775
Registered: 14-6-2007
Location: Springs Junction, New Zealand
Member Is Offline

Mood: Comfortably Numb

[*] posted on 10-8-2007 at 08:35


Quote:
Originally posted by Eclectic
Do the chemicals in the matches actually make any difference?


I don't think so!

Eclectic, you are spot on with your link!

It's the colouring agent that is being extracted, in the upper layer and that is what is glowing when the matches are illuminated with UV. The references to phosphorus are bullshit! The video maker is confused! The pinkish dye is probably a rhodamine type dye.


Xenoid
View user's profile View All Posts By User
YT2095
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1091
Registered: 31-5-2003
Location: Just left of Europe and down a bit.
Member Is Offline

Mood: within Nominal Parameters

[*] posted on 10-8-2007 at 08:50


probably B then, as 6G is a little less vivid and more Red than the In-You-Face acid Pink of B.


nope, I just tried it, Rhodamine B and NaOCl (12%) and then 9% H2O2. no lights!

I think I`ll try the one Eclectic mentioned in the article with the Alcohol etc...

it won`t be today though.


[Edited on 10-8-2007 by YT2095]




\"In a world full of wonders mankind has managed to invent boredom\" - Death
Twinkies don\'t have a shelf life. They have a half-life! -Caine (a friend of mine)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Eclectic
National Hazard
****




Posts: 899
Registered: 14-11-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: Obsessive

[*] posted on 10-8-2007 at 09:46


I think you may need an organic substrate for the whole mess to react with. Try injecting it into various fruits and vegetables.

[Edited on 8-10-2007 by Eclectic]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Per
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 134
Registered: 26-1-2007
Location: Europe
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 11-8-2007 at 04:41


Maybe first trying to get the slight glow precursor in the syringe might be more succesfull, until having this reagence attemptions with fruits which are more strenuouse may doesn´t make sense.
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
ssdd
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 13-4-2007
Location: Central Canada
Member Is Offline

Mood: Hypergolic

[*] posted on 11-8-2007 at 06:58


I tried this last night with no result, I think I may have added too much bleach to the match heads....

I am gona try this again later today and see what happens.

Interesting experiment I must say.

-ssdd




All that glitters may not be gold, but at least it contains free electrons.
-- John Desmond Baernal
http://deepnorth.info/
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
YT2095
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1091
Registered: 31-5-2003
Location: Just left of Europe and down a bit.
Member Is Offline

Mood: within Nominal Parameters

[*] posted on 11-8-2007 at 07:45


good point about the bleach, I used my 12%, the sort that hisses when you open the lid and knocks you on your ass with Cl2 gas if you`re not careful.
the Rhodamine B didn`t even dissolve in it until I added the 9% H2O2.




\"In a world full of wonders mankind has managed to invent boredom\" - Death
Twinkies don\'t have a shelf life. They have a half-life! -Caine (a friend of mine)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
ssdd
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 13-4-2007
Location: Central Canada
Member Is Offline

Mood: Hypergolic

[*] posted on 11-8-2007 at 12:20


I tried this once again using less bleach and newer matches... once again a complete failure. What on earth could be going wrong here. (The main difference I see is that I dont get the red liquid when they layer out, I get a whitish clear liquid and a white residue on the bottom.)

anything?
-ssdd




All that glitters may not be gold, but at least it contains free electrons.
-- John Desmond Baernal
http://deepnorth.info/
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
guy
National Hazard
****




Posts: 982
Registered: 14-4-2004
Location: California, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Catalytic!

[*] posted on 11-8-2007 at 14:13


Quote:
Originally posted by ssdd
I tried this once again using less bleach and newer matches... once again a complete failure. What on earth could be going wrong here. (The main difference I see is that I dont get the red liquid when they layer out, I get a whitish clear liquid and a white residue on the bottom.)

anything?
-ssdd


Are you using non-safety matches with white phosphorous? Safety matches use red phosphorous which is not good,
View user's profile View All Posts By User
garage chemist
chemical wizard
*****




Posts: 1803
Registered: 16-8-2004
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 11-8-2007 at 14:37


There are no matches with white phosphorus. Those have been outlawed LONG ago.
Also, white phos doesnt glow in solution! Get that thought out of your head that white phos might play any role here!
White phos is also insoluble in water, and is oxidised by bleach to phosphoric acid WITHOUT appearance of any glow- I tried that out myself!




www.versuchschemie.de
Das aktivste deutsche Chemieforum!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
guy
National Hazard
****




Posts: 982
Registered: 14-4-2004
Location: California, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Catalytic!

[*] posted on 11-8-2007 at 15:11


Quote:
Originally posted by garage chemist
There are no matches with white phosphorus. Those have been outlawed LONG ago.
Also, white phos doesnt glow in solution! Get that thought out of your head that white phos might play any role here!
White phos is also insoluble in water, and is oxidised by bleach to phosphoric acid WITHOUT appearance of any glow- I tried that out myself!


Ok haha. Then what are non safety matches made out of nowadays? That video confused me.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Xenoid
National Hazard
****




Posts: 775
Registered: 14-6-2007
Location: Springs Junction, New Zealand
Member Is Offline

Mood: Comfortably Numb

[*] posted on 11-8-2007 at 20:45


Quote:
Originally posted by guy
Ok haha. Then what are non safety matches made out of nowadays? That video confused me.


As pointed out earlier in the thread by Bromic Acid, strike anywhere matches (if you can find them) contain a phosphorus sulphide (P4S3) together with potassium chlorate and/or manganese dioxide, glue, powdered glass and colouring agent.

From what I can gather the important material here is the "colouring agent".

The references to "high in phosphorus" in the video are incorrect, what he means is "highly phosphorescent", (in UV light). But even this is wrong, he should really say "highly fluorescent, in UV light". The red matches (safety) that I buy don't glow particularly well in UV, but when the head is scraped off, the stained wood underneath glows very brightly, just like pink "day-glow" plastic. This possibly suggests it is a rhodamine type dye! I extracted the dye from some pink "day-glow" plastic, using acetone, it looks just like the extract in the video, but I can't get that intermediate glow (with bleach). I don't have any H2O2 at the moment, so I can't do any further tests!

Xenoid

[Edited on 11-8-2007 by Xenoid]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  

  Go To Top