Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Passing liquid through vacuum tubing?
Nitrox2
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 62
Registered: 10-6-2025
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 13-6-2025 at 12:13
Passing liquid through vacuum tubing?


Could 2 of these cold traps be used as a microscale distillation apparatus, and at vacuum???


By connecting the two tubes with vacuum tubing, and a tube to vacuum, could liquid essentially be distilled at vacuum, and condensed in the second tube, assuming it is chilled in dry ice and acetone, and connected to vacuum?


k.jpg - 24kB



[Edited on 13-6-2025 by Nitrox2]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
bnull
National Hazard
****




Posts: 994
Registered: 15-1-2024
Location: East Woods
Member Is Offline

Mood: Fecking annoyed

[*] posted on 13-6-2025 at 13:42


What are you trying to distil?



Quod scripsi, scripsi.

B. N. Ull

We have a lot of fun stuff in the Library.

Read The ScienceMadness Guidelines. They exist for a reason.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
CouchHatter
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 154
Registered: 28-10-2017
Location: Oklahoma
Member Is Offline

Mood: 76 elements taken!

[*] posted on 13-6-2025 at 14:56


I agree, it really depends on what you're distilling. The physics of the idea work, but I doubt its efficacy. In my experience, lengthening the condenser is more worthwhile than managing dry ice and acetone, unless your distillate NEEDS those extreme low temps. Are you talking about foregoing a hotplate, and only relying on vacuum to boil the pot?

The relatively short path to vacuum could cause lots of vapors to bypass the "condenser" trap #2, since the surface-area-to-distance ratio is worse than a traditional vacuum distillation setup. But for things which don't require a large vacuum, it might work decently.

r12.png - 48kB
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2918
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline

Mood: Mildly disgruntled scientist

[*] posted on 21-6-2025 at 03:38


Those will not work well for distillations, but can work OK. They make special small scale distillation heads, look at the 3 in the middle row of:

https://chemglass.com/distillation-heads are hard to use and expensive, see right most piece of this link

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/product/aldrich/z558575

For very small amounts a Kugelrohr is used, they can do a few mls, similar to how you described above, but with a straight, short path between the bulbs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelrohr
View user's profile View All Posts By User
BromicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3324
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline

Mood: Rock n' Roll

[*] posted on 21-6-2025 at 16:18


Have seen that done before in the literature, i.e., material was distilled, material collected in the trap, trap was connected in series and allowed to warm up to a new trap in dry ice to get a separate fraction.

On a more practical view, I have had plenty of times where I strip off solvents to our house vacuum (a valve on the wall that goes to our industrial pump) and just to through a side-arm using vacuum tubing. It is much slower than a standard distillation because gasses take up a lot more volume than a liquid so you're relying on this large volume of gas to go to your pump instead of having everything condense on the distillation side. I do it but it's slower.




Shamelessly plugging my attempts at writing fiction: http://www.robvincent.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Mateo_swe
National Hazard
****




Posts: 590
Registered: 24-8-2019
Location: Within EU
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 30-6-2025 at 04:01


I would just buy a short-path distillation kit on ebay or similar.
You can find them from china for quite cheap and they work good, no hassle or problems.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top