homechemistry
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 12-4-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
HELP!
I fumbled on two questions from my assigned work. Any help is appreciated!
1. If a reaction releases 50kJ of heat, what is the change in enthalpy for the reaction?( indicate whether this change is positive or negative)
2.If the rate of reaction is 3.0 x 10^-3 M/s at 20 degrees Celsius, what would the rate be if the temperature was increased to 40 degrees Celsius?
|
|
Etaoin Shrdlu
National Hazard
Posts: 724
Registered: 25-12-2013
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Insufferable
|
|
What work have you done on it so far?
|
|
homechemistry
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 12-4-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
i think the first one is - 50 kJ and the second i have no clue
|
|
Zombie
Forum Hillbilly
Posts: 1700
Registered: 13-1-2015
Location: Florida PanHandle
Member Is Offline
Mood: I just don't know...
|
|
Dude... You are so screwed.
These guys will make you figure it out.
They tried to have me "put to sleep" so I came back to return the favor.
Zom.
|
|
Molecular Manipulations
Hazard to Others
Posts: 447
Registered: 17-12-2014
Location: The Garden of Eden
Member Is Offline
Mood: High on forbidden fruit
|
|
It's considered common courtesy to show an attempt at solving the questions, but since you posted this in Beginnings, and since the answers are so
easy, I'll give you some help.
#1: Energy released is indicated negatively to show that the enthalpy in the atom that bonds (releasing energy) decreases afterwards (because the
energy is given off). So the answer is: the change in enthalpy = -50kJ.
#2: This one's not really possible to answer 100% without knowing the specific chemical reaction who's rate is in question. However I'm going to bet
your teacher or textbook mentioned an approximation regarding the increase in rate and temperature. Usually they say that for every 10°C increase the
rate doubles. This generalization has many exceptions, but is for the most part is correct.
Since the temp increases by 20°C the reaction rate should double, twice.
I'll let you do the math here, since I already gave you the answer.
[EDIT]
I love this quote:
[Edited on 18-4-2015 by Molecular Manipulations]
-The manipulator
We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know. -W. H. Auden
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6307
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
FWIW, I would consider both of these to be poorly-framed questions. The second for the reasons that MM stated. The rate rule required is a rule of
thumb only and without specifics it is difficult to have any confidence in the answer at all.
The first does not specify a quantity. One assumes that the figure given is per mole, but it is a bit on the high side for many reactions. It may be
per kg of a particular reactant or... well, who knows?
Trying to teach a meaningful concept in the absence of a meaningful context is kinda couterproductive. You can end up knowing all the answers and
still not having a clue. (The same goes for assessment as for teaching.)
|
|
homechemistry
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 12-4-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
for the second question i came up with the answer of 1.2 x 10^-2 M/s.
|
|
Etaoin Shrdlu
National Hazard
Posts: 724
Registered: 25-12-2013
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Insufferable
|
|
Doesn't matter. The question asks for the enthalpy change of the reaction, and gives heat released during the reaction. No need to write it in terms
of moles or mass.
The second question was iffy though.
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6307
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Etaoin Shrdlu |
Doesn't matter. The question asks for the enthalpy change of the reaction, and gives heat released during the reaction. No need to write it in terms
of moles or mass.
The second question was iffy though. | I know that technically it doesn't matter. But it is not that
meaningful either.
|
|
Etaoin Shrdlu
National Hazard
Posts: 724
Registered: 25-12-2013
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Insufferable
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by j_sum1 | Quote: Originally posted by Etaoin Shrdlu |
Doesn't matter. The question asks for the enthalpy change of the reaction, and gives heat released during the reaction. No need to write it in terms
of moles or mass.
The second question was iffy though. | I know that technically it doesn't matter. But it is not that
meaningful either. |
Sure it is. I'm assuming this is highschool stuff and they're just trying to get across the basic concept that enthalpy change is equal to energy
transferred from the environment before relating it to anything specific. Isn't enthalpy generally introduced in relation to a generic "system" first?
EDIT: vagueness
[Edited on 4-18-2015 by Etaoin Shrdlu]
|
|
homechemistry
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 12-4-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
so is my answer to number 2 correct?
|
|