Pages:
1
2
3
4
..
25 |
PrimoPyro
on fire
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 122
Registered: 7-8-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Alkalai Aluminum Hydrides
Well, what about Fe3O4 and KAlH4? (shiver in fear at the thought of its sensitivity)
That should be quite 'hot'.
Lithium aluminum hydride is common, and potassium aluminum hydride would provide more energythan the lithium salt.
Question is, would they burst into flame upon contact, or would a mixture be stable enough to be set off intentionally. Regardless, even if it is
'stable enough' I'd never recommend storing the mixture, as it would provide MUUUUUCH more energy than standard thermite, I think.
PrimoPyro
|
|
Nick F
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 439
Registered: 7-9-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just wondering, did anyone ever try mixing CuO/Al with a small amount of binder, such as polyester resin, before either detonation or ignition? I'm
particularly interested in detonating bound mixtures...
Anyone know if it works? It could make good little flash-bangs...
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How about CaC2/Fe2O3? The formation of CaO should gives quite a good enthalpy.
Not to speak of KMnO4/CaC2.....
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
bonemachine
Harmless
Posts: 47
Registered: 27-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Is it posible to use CuO with fuels of lower ingnition point?
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How about Ag2O2 and Al/Mg/CaC2/ LiAlH4?
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
bonemachine
Harmless
Posts: 47
Registered: 27-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I am thinking to make 200grams of CuO/AL. If i confine this in paper tube will it be powerfull like flash? Or not?
|
|
bonemachine
Harmless
Posts: 47
Registered: 27-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
So it seems that it has alot of blasting power. But compared to common flash powders how powerfull could be 200grams??
Also I realy don't understand how CuO/Al detonates. If it would realy detonate then simply CuO could also do. Am i right? Or the mixture can ingnite
so fast before the elements separate from each other from the blast?
|
|
bonemachine
Harmless
Posts: 47
Registered: 27-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Maybe this doesn't got to do much with thermite but i was always wondering what could hapend if a hot glowing thermite falls inside a container full
of potasium nitrate. My first thought was that a very violend deflagration will occur trowing hot particles everywhere. But on second thought if you
consider that the heat is so high to decompose even water then why not to detonate potassium nitrate? I am planing to test this soon.... Any one has
any experience about this or just imagine what could hapend if thermite ingnites in a container with a nitrate oxidiser?
|
|
bonemachine
Harmless
Posts: 47
Registered: 27-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I made some CuO (by heating strongly Cu(OH) from electrolysis cell until it turns totaly black) and mixed it with 600mesh Al flake. I have trouble
ingniting it. I used a barium nitrate/Fe fuse and the AL sparked a little bit but failed to deflagrate with CuO. What temperature needs CuO/Al to
ingnite? Would be good to add some sulfur to the CuO/Al mix so it can be ingnited easy or it will slow down the burn rate? Also i had a thought to add
some kno3 to make it more ingnitable will this work?
Oh and a last one, Carbon reduces CuO at low temperatures could be used as fuell?
plz someone anser!!
|
|
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Waiting for spring
|
|
In what proportions did you mix the aluminum flake with the copper oxide? They should be in a stoichiometric ratio for best results. If you're not
sure what a stoichiometric ratio is, see my earlier advice about acquiring some chemistry books. A good igniter mixture is powdered aluminum and
sulfur, again in a stoichiometric ratio (or somewhat off of such a ratio if you want it to burn slower). I don't think you'll improve your CuO/Al
mixture any by adding carbon, sulfur, or potassium nitrate. BTW, if you can get 600 mesh aluminum, why do you have to resort to electrolysis to get
copper oxide? You should be able to get it cheaply from a pyrotechnic or ceramic supplier.
|
|
bonemachine
Harmless
Posts: 47
Registered: 27-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I mix them in equal volumetric parts (i don't have a scale). There is no ceramics where i live wich sell CuO but Al powder i can find easy in hardware
shops. I think that barium nitrate/Fe fuse burned hot like the S/Al mix but it didn't light. Would a kno3/Al/S mix ingnite the thermite reliably?
thanks for the reply
|
|
bonemachine
Harmless
Posts: 47
Registered: 27-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Damn i tryed again CuO/Al and it didn't worked. Just some Al sparking and then it goes of. And the yields of Cu(OH) with elctrolysis is to small. When
i heat it to form CuO the volume gets even smaler!.Two days of electrolysis for a gram or 2. It is realy pain in the ass to make it that way. Guess i
am never gona make it. ![:(](./images/smilies/sad.gif)
Any other sugestions to make a super fast burning thermite? I have very fine Al.
|
|
Alchemist
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 93
Registered: 22-6-2002
Location: Hostton Texas
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Zn instead of Al
Hello all,
just to let ya all know, CuO and powered Zinc is as reactive as CuO and Al or even a little more so. Penny's after 1982 (USA) are almost 99% Zinc.
Zinc is very easily (well almost) powered in a ball mill while still warm. Zinc is also reactive with other Oxides also, but I can't find my list.
Sorry I will keep looking. More late, I hope!
|
|
bonemachine
Harmless
Posts: 47
Registered: 27-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Actually my problem is the manufacture of sizeable amounds of CuO with starting material Cu. I manage to make some with electrolysis but all my tests
(with CuO/Al) failed and i must wait to electrolise for two days to get 2 grams for another testing....
|
|
bonemachine
Harmless
Posts: 47
Registered: 27-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I am quite sure that i read recent that Cu2O is prepared comercialy by elctrolysis but it doesn't describe how
Cu2O is red isn't it?
|
|
Nick F
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 439
Registered: 7-9-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Cu2O is red, CuO is black.
Bonemachine, don't you have any nitric acid? Cu(NO3)2 is easily made into CuO...
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
CuSO4 -heat/air-> CuO + SO3
Cu(NO3)2 -heat->CuO + NOx
NOx can be condensed as N2O4(l) to make panclastites!
Cu + H2SO4 or HNO3 --> CuSO4 or Cu(NO3)2
CuSO4 + 2NaOH --> Na2SO4 + Cu(OH)2(turquoise ppte)
(idem with Cu(NO3)2)!
CaC2 is not a burning fuel even with O2 or HNO3 it doesn't burn; don't expect it to burn with lower oxydisers like CuO!
It is made from CaO and C in electric furnace!
If your CuO/Al doesn't work maybe incriminate your Al powder; it has to be very smooth, without fats, thin oxyd layer!
A fast decomposition doesn't mean detonation!
All what goes over 350 m/s will make a strong bang!If you put a detonator on it; it will boost a bit the reaction, but it will stil not be a
detonation! I have boosted many times black powders with primaries powdered all arround in the charge...it increases power and speed but it is not a
detonation in the proper sense of the term!
If the burning speed is 1000m/s it is still a deflagration; it displays brisance properties!
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3231
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
Speaking of silver oxides I have had some experience. Before I knew better I decided to recycle my soluble silver wastes, I precipitated them out
with hydroxide to for the oxide Ag2O. I figured this would burn with a vengeance so I decided to throw in some liquid sulfur as a binder. The
aluminum power, liquid sulfur, and silver oxide went together without a hitch, but when I was placing the mixture in the cast I had for it, after it
cooled down a bit it started crackling and glowing red hot. Before I could toss it away the whole solidified top blew off and the mixture went up
REAL fast tossing debris in the air. Not sure how the oxide would have gone up without the sulfur, it could have moderated the reaction, or it could
have been the cause of it going up so quickly.
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
CuO and Al
elsewhere I heard that CuO and Al is one of the most powerful thermite mixtures. So I set out to make prepare it. I mixed NaOH ( in solution ) and
CuSO4 in stoichiometric amounts, and washed the bright blue Cu(OH)2 precipitate many times to make sure no Na2So4 is left. trust me, none was left
![:)](./images/smilies/smile.gif)
This i dried in the sun, and heated it to at least 300 deg C under a bunsen flame. the powder turned black, and its propertiers are a bit like
activated charcoal (i.e. nearly like a liquid - quite cool to look at)
This I mixed with Al (0.2 mm or less), and ignited as usual with a few sparkling candles tied togetha. It worked fine, but about as vigorous (or
probably less) as the standard Fe2O3/Al mixture. Couldnt see any difference between the two. any idea why it is not as vigorous as some say, in this
thread????
[Edited on 26-8-2003 by chemoleo]
|
|
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Waiting for spring
|
|
vigor
I was using aluminum powder (300 mesh) instead of granular Al. I'm sure that makes quite a difference.
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
sure, but then, I used the same Al for the Al/Fe2O3. so the differnce should be relative. and i didnt notice any relative difference
but maybe that type of reasoning doesnt hold here...
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
Cu2O and Al
Recently tried some Cu2O (commercial, from potters supplies) and Al (200 mesh). This uses a very large amount of Cu2O, I found (about 200 g total).
Anyway, the reaction (after ignition with sparkling candles was very slow), emitting large amounts of smoke (orange-ish, like a smoke flare), and
taking quite some time - so good for presentation purposes .
After the reaction, I obtained a large block of solid copper, which, upon cooling, forms concentric rings of rainbow colours (this hast gone into my
arts collection )
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
A mixture of a reactive metal in the elemental state and a more noble metal in an oxidized state is a thermite mixture.
The reactive metal reduces the noble metal to it's elemental state, whereas the reactive metal is being oxidized (mostly to its oxide).
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
alchemist_fire
Harmless
Posts: 1
Registered: 11-11-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
here is an easy one that I figured out by accident 2:1 magnesium to lead dioxide from car battries the reaction is explosive and if you you fill a
small aspirin bottle with this powder and stick a nice fuse into the powder it makes a very nice loud explosion
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
Thermites with CuO, MnO2 and Fe3O4
Some updates on exotic thermites:
I recently purchased some CuO, MnO2 and Fe3O4 (and others, but didnt get round to testing them).
Using 200 mesh Al, I found CuO to be by far the most vigorous. It is set off by mere sparks (be careful, I nearly got my ass burned), and burns
(unconfined) with a great whoosh type sound, and vaporises all the products, i.e. no residue is left. Burning time is too short to measure. On the
video camera it happens within a few frames. Will test this on occasion in a confined manner. Anyway, i tried the same with homemade CuO, and the
results were by far not as vigorous... I am still struggling to explain why, after all I used clean reagents, and heated the homemade CuO to a dull
red glow....
The MnO2 is hard to set off (compared to the CuO), but the reaction is also very fast, and leaves very little residue. But by no means it can be
compared to the CuO. I was hoping MnO2 would be very powerful as it is an oxidiser in itself (I know, nearly every oxide is with respect to Al, but
it's definitely a strong oxidant ), but still it doesnt compare at all to CuO... It's only a little faster than with Fe2O3.
Fe3O4 was the slowest, the reaction took up to 15 seconds, with lots of sparks/molten metal globules spraying everywhere, it looks very pretty but is
not very vigorous. Definitely top choice for showing a nice pyro effect.
I have a few more to test, which is NiO, Sb2O3, V2O5, Cr2O3 and ZrSiO4... where I am not sure the latter will work - but always wanted to lay my hands on some zirconium!
[Edited on 15-12-2003 by chemoleo]
Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
|
|
Pages:
1
2
3
4
..
25 |