Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Primary Explosives
Xenos
Harmless
*




Posts: 22
Registered: 29-8-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-9-2002 at 10:08
Primary Explosives


Ive been reading up on the various primary explosives. Most of them seem very difficult to make. From experience, what would be an easy effective pirmary. Would TACC or Lead Trinitrooxybenzoate be good? Never know when you might need this information :)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
madscientist
National Hazard
****




Posts: 962
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: American Midwest
Member Is Offline

Mood: pyrophoric

[*] posted on 2-9-2002 at 10:20


Unfortunately, it seems that difficulty of preparation goes hand-in-hand with the quality of the primary. Acetone peroxide is the easiest to make, and is one of the worst; it's volatile, unstable, and not that powerful. HMTD is a little better, but is still quite sensitive. DDNP and lead azide are some of the best primaries, but they take a considerable amount of effort to prepare (if you're not going to mail order any chemicals). DDNP (diazodinitrophenol) can be prepared from the following starting chemicals: acetylsalicylic acid, sodium nitrate, sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, sulfur, and sodium nitrite (easily made from sodium nitrate, see thread on "Preparation of ionic nitrites" in General Chemistry). Lead azide can be prepared from nitric or acetic acid, lead metal, sodium nitrite, and hydrazine (usually prepared from reacting NaOCl and NH3, adding gelatin to the mix to sequester Cu++ ions which catalyze a competing reaction that destroys hydrazine).

If you're working with limited resources, I'd recommend HMTD. But if you can, avoid any primary that is an organic peroxide. I also would stay away from mercury fulminate, which is supposed to be terribly friction sensitive. What chemicals do you have access to? It's hard to make a recommendation without that knowledge. :)




I weep at the sight of flaming acetic anhydride.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ramiel
Vicious like a ferret
***




Posts: 484
Registered: 19-8-2002
Location: Room at the Back, Australia
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-demented

[*] posted on 3-9-2002 at 02:22


Yes, I intend to make DDNP, it seems to be a great quality primary, and not too sensitive (which is a big consideration for me).

ps. Would Potassium Nitrate/nitrite be a suitable substitute for Sodium Nitrate/Nitrite?

pps. Someone I know well has a licence for buying High Explosives etc. in Australia (that is HARD to get in Aus.). This person was talking about different "Frequency" detonaters. I've never come across this term before, could someone clarify this for me?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
Madog
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 221
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: lysergic

[*] posted on 3-9-2002 at 05:50


i may make DDNP soon. potassium and sodium nitrate/nitrite are interchangeable. except that the sodium compounds have more NO3 or NO2 per gram than the k compounds. this can be easily calculateed though.

frequenceys? do you mean the numbers?

here is what i know

#1 - smallest. will detonate NG, PETN, MHN, 80 PETN/20 TNT pentolite. of course there are more but those are the common ones.

#6- used to be the industry standard until it was made o #8. this will detonate dynamite and all sorts of fun things. im pretty sure this will detonate C4 but it is more reliable to use a #8 cap.

#8 - this is the industry standard. a synonym for it is "military blasting cap". it will detonate alot of stuff. i have herd that a #8 is 750mg of PETN or RDX but then again i have herd that it is 1g of AP. i would go with the 750mg of PETN or RDX.

#10 - this is the "highest" i heard it was 2g of mercury fulminate. but i herd somone mention a #13 cap once so it may not be the bigest.

of course there are caps inbetween but they are not often used or mentioned.

a simprovisers we dont useualy get to use such things so there is confuseion over what exactly they are.




Most people outgrow their pyro tendencies, we are the ones who\'s tendencies outgrew us.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
Xenos
Harmless
*




Posts: 22
Registered: 29-8-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-9-2002 at 10:22


I have:
KNO3
KClO4
NH4 NO3
S
NH4 CO3
CuSO4
Sr/Ba (NO3)2
Al, Zn, Mg
Lead Oxide for some reason
Hg
Weak, 30% H2SO4 (im working on getting 90%)
A plan to make HNO3 which i havnt tried
Acetone
NaF
Na2C2O4
Sodium Benzoate
And other stuff that doesnt seem too important right now, or that i can easily buy
View user's profile View All Posts By User
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic

[*] posted on 9-9-2002 at 15:39


Hg oxalate!
Hg acetylide nitrato complex!
Cu(NH3)4(ClO4)2!

Those are already a good start!

PH Z
View user's profile View All Posts By User
wittiness2
Harmless
*




Posts: 2
Registered: 4-10-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-10-2002 at 19:37
primary explosives


2,3-naphthacene (tetracene)
C2H8N10O
vod > 4500 m/s
d ~ 189 g/mol
mp/dc > 160 C

are a sensitive primary explosive with low density.
It`s actual no a primary explosive, instead designed to mix with other explosives in blasting caps or
booster charges and can be used to ignite bounded high secondary explosives than hexogen/octogen/TNA .
2,3-naphthacene are a yellow breezy powder, which are used sometimes in photooptic-elements.
It`s sensitive to shock and heat, and explodes when ignited by flame or heat.
The brisiance of tetracene are very high
at powdered density.
The manufacturing are sometimes expensive, therefore it was, prepared outside the USA, in laboratorys for instance in Venezuela.




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
wittiness2
Harmless
*




Posts: 2
Registered: 4-10-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-10-2002 at 19:42
2,3-naphthacene




2,3-naphtacene.jpg - 37kB
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
crusader
Harmless
*




Posts: 1
Registered: 9-10-2002
Location: behind the mirror
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-10-2002 at 08:15
problems with fumes


How i can protect me of toxic fumes
by preparation of r-salt.
To 51 ml concentrated HCl add 14 g HMT
and cool. After cooling add 5 g of NaNO2.
The evaporating yellow fumes are toxic (NOX).
Exist a apparatus to fume-protection ?




Lifeguard for Hydrazine !
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
*********




Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline

Mood: Waiting for spring

[*] posted on 9-10-2002 at 11:06


Work outdoors. Use a vacuum cleaner to suck the fumes away from the reaction and carry them outside (as Rhadon has suggested). Note that this may be detrimental to metallic components of the vacuum cleaner over time. You can usually add NaNO2 to acidic mixtures without very much fuming if your solution is truly cold and you add the nitrite gradually. How cold are you making your solution first?
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
tito-o-mac
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 117
Registered: 30-6-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 1-7-2007 at 00:43


No way! Do not use the vacuum cleaner! If you do, the gasses may get trap in the vacuum cleaner and heat from the motor may raise the temperature, resulting in dire consequences! If you do, use in moderation! Too bad I'm 5 years late to this response!:(
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Swany
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 188
Registered: 11-4-2005
Location: My happy place...
Member Is Offline

Mood: Sanguine

[*] posted on 5-7-2007 at 18:39


Dire consequences such as what? I really dont see how gas could trap in the cleaner itself. If you filled the bag with activated charcoal or put a filter on the hose, I see a potentially very useful device. Its not as if he was vacuuming pure acetylene away. Relatively small amounts of nitrogen oxides. Nice of you to try and save the world, albiet 5 years too late....

In other primary-explosive related news, I am going to attempt some nitrodiazobenzonium derivs coordinated with metals. Just a muse...
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger

  Go To Top