Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Plutonium reactions - how'd they figure this stuff out?
j_sum1
Administrator
********




Posts: 6200
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline

Mood: Lab bench has too many unfinished projects. :(

[*] posted on 29-9-2023 at 15:17
Plutonium reactions - how'd they figure this stuff out?


Side topic from Finding small amounts of Pu or U235
That thread is likely destined for Detritus but it did raise some questions for me.

I posted this video which shows how Pu(NO3)4 is reduced to metallic plutonium. (The video presents a flow diagram of the process in the first 3 minutes then repeats the same information showing the actual equipment.)
Plutonium Metal Preparation


Two reactions interest me. One is the formation of a peroxide complex to precipitate plutonium nitrate.
The second is the use of elemental calcium and elemental iodine together to reduce PuF4 to Pu.

How did anyone figure out these were feasible routes?
Why would you expect the peroxide complex to be insoluble (and selective)? Why would you choose Ca and I2 for the reduction? I can't imagine anyone had a significant amount of raw material to develop these processes. It must have been more than a hunch to derive the methodology.
And that second reaction seems a strange choice. I am guessing the reaction is
PuF4 + Ca + I2 --> Pu + CaF2 + 2IF
But other stoichiometries are possible.

Thoughts


(Placed in general chem because I am interested in the reactions and the mode of discovery.)
And, on second thoughts, moving to Radiochemistry.




[Edited on 29-9-2023 by j_sum1]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
j_sum1
Administrator
Thread Moved
29-9-2023 at 15:21
pantone159
National Hazard
****




Posts: 585
Registered: 27-6-2006
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: desperate for shade

[*] posted on 29-9-2023 at 18:49


Part of the answer, was working with extremely small amounts of Pu in the early days, to study Pu chemistry and figure out purification that would work. It was a triumph of nano-scale chemistry, especially with 1940's technology.

The Ca+I2 sounded strange to me also, but late in that video there was a comment that this heated up the Ca to where it worked for the reduction. I wasn't sure what to make of that comment.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
UC235
National Hazard
****




Posts: 562
Registered: 28-12-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 29-9-2023 at 20:06


Uranium and thorium form insoluble peroxides, so it seems like a good place to start.

[Edited on 30-9-2023 by UC235]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
wg48temp9
National Hazard
****




Posts: 757
Registered: 30-12-2018
Location: not so United Kingdom
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 29-9-2023 at 20:12


It seemed unlikely that any interhalogen compound would form, as it would combine with the plutonium metal.

Apparently, the plutonium is reduced by the calcium to form calcium fluoride. Additional calcium combines with the iodine to heat up the reaction, and the formed calcium iodide reduces the melting point (fluxes) of the calcium fluoride to allow the plutonium to form a button at the bottom of the crucible.

See Attachment: 4438226.pdf (894kB)
This file has been downloaded 84 times




I am wg48 but not on my usual pc hence the temp handle.
Thank goodness for Fleming and the fungi.
Old codger' lives matters, wear a mask and help save them.
Be aware of demagoguery, keep your frontal lobes fully engaged.
I don't know who invented mRNA vaccines but they should get a fancy medal and I hope they made a shed load of money from it.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pumukli
National Hazard
****




Posts: 686
Registered: 2-3-2014
Location: EU
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 29-9-2023 at 21:02


j-sum, Ca as reducing agent seems fairly logical for me. Reductions by metals were widespread in those early days. The "tendency" of Ca2+ to combine with F- and yield practically insoluble CaF2 makes this choice attractive.
Maybe, they tried these reactions on other "model compounds" previously and found them "worthwhile".
View user's profile View All Posts By User
j_sum1
Administrator
********




Posts: 6200
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline

Mood: Lab bench has too many unfinished projects. :(

[*] posted on 29-9-2023 at 21:41


So, I2 is there as an energy boost and to create a flux
Makes sense.

Still, there is a lot of creative thinking to devise such a process.

I really am in awe.
Even determining MP would have been a challenge. If I was to guess, I would have gone a lot higher.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5098
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 30-9-2023 at 02:53


Fluorine gets its name from fluorspar which is essentially naturally occurring calcium fluoride.
Fluorspar gets its name from its use in metallurgy as a flux- very loosely it means "flow stone".

So roughly 1500 years before anyone knew about plutonium, they knew that calcium fluoride was a useful flux.
Hardly shocking that they chose to use it.


[Edited on 30-9-23 by unionised]
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top