Achilles
Harmless
Posts: 22
Registered: 18-9-2023
Member Is Offline
|
|
question about primaries
i am studying primaries explosives and in trying to find a good compromise between efficiency and cost. but ive came across to some issues? or maybe
im just too ignorant..
at the very first i was making them with 0.2tatp and 0,8petn
but tatp is an awful choice..
is silver acetilyde a good choice? the VOD is low and i dont very understand the chemical difference between it and the double salt they both have a
low VOD btw..
NHN seems powerful and stable but i heard people complaining about its explosive properties and i was wondering if it can be used or no..
third question is if you advice me any other primary
|
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
Posts: 1117
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
I think you are confusing detonator and primary. What you describe in the second line of your post is some primary and secondary explosive. If you
have put them together under some sort of confinement with a means to initiate them you have made a detonator.
Firstly, I would recommend checking out the science madness library and do some reading on energetic substances and you will find that some of these
questions may be answered and no doubt you will have a bunch more questions.
Secondly, there are numerous threads on science madness with near endless options for primaries that you can try depending on what you are trying to
achieve.
Thirdly, you may find that you do not get much of a response to this post because a) you don't come across as having done much research already to try
and answer these questions for yourself, b) you have not included information in your post about what you are trying to achieve and c) no one wants to
give you information that you use to accidentally injure yourself or someone else.
You might like to consider giving some context around these questions:
- What is it that you are studying about primaries?
- How do you do this safely/demonstrate a satisfactory level of competence?
- What options do you have for initiation?
- What research/tests have you done so far and what specific information are you lacking and trying to find?
Finally, as you have already indicated, TATP is not a great choice. TATP is volatile and comparatively sensitive to most stimuli (heat, spark, shock
and friction). It also present little challenge or interest in its synthetic route.
It can be fun to see the fruits of your chemical labour go up in a cloud of smoke or with a loud report, but loosing digits, eyes or worse is no fun
at all. Stay safe.
|
|
|
DennyDevHE77
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 15-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
You don't have to be so categorical. Yes, indeed, acetone peroxide has a number of problems, the main ones being high volatility, crystal growth and
increased sensitivity, as well as high sensitivity to friction and static. But it compensates for this by being extremely cheap and easy to make. As a
result, it is the best initiating explosive when nothing else is available, and the finished detonator primer is not expected to be stored for more
than a couple of weeks. Although I am generally against storing ready-made detonator caps on acetone peroxide. It is better to store it in powder form
on a piece of paper and not prevent it from evaporating.
The detonation velocity of silver acetylenide-nitrate is 4450 m/s at 5.36 g/mL, and 2710 m/s at 2.92 g/mL. This is slightly less than lead azide, but
it is not correct to compare initiating explosives on the basis of detonation velocity. These substances are supposed to be used to detonate secondary
explosives, and here the area of transition to detonation has a much greater influence than the velocity itself. Acetone peroxide in the form of a
small mound of powder simply flashes when ignited, sometimes with a slight pop, while lead azide, for example, detonates. Although acetone peroxide is
more powerful than lead azide, and in the case of large detonators for low-sensitivity explosives, say 5g, acetone peroxide will definitely be more
effective (but don't do so unless absolutely necessary, given that you have PETN, you don't have such a need).
The difference between silver acetylenide (Ag2C2) and the complex (Ag2C2•AgNO3) is very large. The first substance does not involve any use. It is
much more sensitive than acetylenide-nitrate, can explode already during pressing, much weaker (On a 0.75mm lead plate from an explosion of 1-2 g of
pure silver acetylenide, a weak dent remains, while silver nitrate-acetylenide penetrates it, and the hole is larger than the diameter of the
detonator capsule body), and its initiating properties are lower than Ag2C2•AgNO3 in addition, when in contact with organic substances, it becomes
very sensitive to impact and compression.
While the complex (Ag2C2•AgNO3) is less (or similarly, depending on the manufacturing method) sensitive to shocks than lead azide (from 43 to 79 cm
for a load weighing 500 g), lead azide - 43 cm, mercury fulminate - 24 cm. Also, Ag2C2•AgNO3 is almost similar in initiating ability to lead azide
(for Ag2C2•AgNO3, 0.02g for tetryl, 0.03-0.1 g for picric acid, 0.15-0.05 for TNT, lead azide is almost the same) in general, it does not matter,
you are unlikely to hit less than 0.2-0.3 g, Ag2C2•AgNO3 is stored for a long time, although, of course, it is not as heat-resistant.
NHN is a good primary explosive, but it has its own nuances in manufacturing (a good agitator is needed), plus, like any primary explosive for safe
detonators, it requires proper pressing (from 25 to 60 MPa), at 30Mpa 0.15 g (lead azide 0.03) for PETN. But again, no one usually presses less than
0.2. And you also need the right detonator, that is, you will not be able to fill it as azide, you will need to properly seal it (ideally fill it with
epoxy).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPxdDSUGxo4 - correct synthesis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN1eK4Oyd04 - the right detonator
It's hard to advise something if the criteria are unknown. In home manufacture, reagents are still most often needed. From their presence, it
immediately becomes clear what is available to a person. For example, maybe you have silver (or its salts), but no access to acetylene. Then you can
make silver fulminate, it is more powerful than mercury fulminate and less sensitive (if properly manufactured, again). In general, there is too much
to advise.
[Edited on 31-10-2023 by DennyDevHE77]
[Edited on 31-10-2023 by DennyDevHE77]
|
|
|
EF2000
Hazard to Others
Posts: 109
Registered: 10-5-2023
Location: The Steppes, now trapped in the forest zone
Member Is Offline
Mood: wrooom
|
|
If you have copper wire, ammonia water and ammonium perchlorate, you can ditch all those primaries. And make TACP and its upgraded version CHP. They
will require metal tubes for detonators to work properly, but they are safe and really powerful.
SADS is a bit on weaker side, but it's good point is ability to detonate in very small amounts, thus high reliability.
NHN is rather unreliable alone, but can be easily upgraded with sodium chlorate and a bit of soap. Look up recent thread about that composition by
user papaya, some real blast
Wroom wroom
|
|
|
Achilles
Harmless
Posts: 22
Registered: 18-9-2023
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by B(a)P  | I think you are confusing detonator and primary. What you describe in the second line of your post is some primary and secondary explosive. If you
have put them together under some sort of confinement with a means to initiate them you have made a detonator.
Firstly, I would recommend checking out the science madness library and do some reading on energetic substances and you will find that some of these
questions may be answered and no doubt you will have a bunch more questions.
Secondly, there are numerous threads on science madness with near endless options for primaries that you can try depending on what you are trying to
achieve.
Thirdly, you may find that you do not get much of a response to this post because a) you don't come across as having done much research already to try
and answer these questions for yourself, b) you have not included information in your post about what you are trying to achieve and c) no one wants to
give you information that you use to accidentally injure yourself or someone else.
You might like to consider giving some context around these questions:
- What is it that you are studying about primaries?
- How do you do this safely/demonstrate a satisfactory level of competence?
- What options do you have for initiation?
- What research/tests have you done so far and what specific information are you lacking and trying to find?
Finally, as you have already indicated, TATP is not a great choice. TATP is volatile and comparatively sensitive to most stimuli (heat, spark, shock
and friction). It also present little challenge or interest in its synthetic route.
It can be fun to see the fruits of your chemical labour go up in a cloud of smoke or with a loud report, but loosing digits, eyes or worse is no fun
at all. Stay safe. |
.
thanks for the advices about the post and the information, im new here and most of the primaries i read on this forum i couldn’t find much
information all the patents videos were deleted and the links weren’t working so yea
|
|
|
Achilles
Harmless
Posts: 22
Registered: 18-9-2023
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by DennyDevHE77 |
You don't have to be so categorical. Yes, indeed, acetone peroxide has a number of problems, the main ones being high volatility, crystal growth and
increased sensitivity, as well as high sensitivity to friction and static. But it compensates for this by being extremely cheap and easy to make. As a
result, it is the best initiating explosive when nothing else is available, and the finished detonator primer is not expected to be stored for more
than a couple of weeks. Although I am generally against storing ready-made detonator caps on acetone peroxide. It is better to store it in powder form
on a piece of paper and not prevent it from evaporating.
The detonation velocity of silver acetylenide-nitrate is 4450 m/s at 5.36 g/mL, and 2710 m/s at 2.92 g/mL. This is slightly less than lead azide, but
it is not correct to compare initiating explosives on the basis of detonation velocity. These substances are supposed to be used to detonate secondary
explosives, and here the area of transition to detonation has a much greater influence than the velocity itself. Acetone peroxide in the form of a
small mound of powder simply flashes when ignited, sometimes with a slight pop, while lead azide, for example, detonates. Although acetone peroxide is
more powerful than lead azide, and in the case of large detonators for low-sensitivity explosives, say 5g, acetone peroxide will definitely be more
effective (but don't do so unless absolutely necessary, given that you have PETN, you don't have such a need).
The difference between silver acetylenide (Ag2C2) and the complex (Ag2C2•AgNO3) is very large. The first substance does not involve any use. It is
much more sensitive than acetylenide-nitrate, can explode already during pressing, much weaker (On a 0.75mm lead plate from an explosion of 1-2 g of
pure silver acetylenide, a weak dent remains, while silver nitrate-acetylenide penetrates it, and the hole is larger than the diameter of the
detonator capsule body), and its initiating properties are lower than Ag2C2•AgNO3 in addition, when in contact with organic substances, it becomes
very sensitive to impact and compression.
While the complex (Ag2C2•AgNO3) is less (or similarly, depending on the manufacturing method) sensitive to shocks than lead azide (from 43 to 79 cm
for a load weighing 500 g), lead azide - 43 cm, mercury fulminate - 24 cm. Also, Ag2C2•AgNO3 is almost similar in initiating ability to lead azide
(for Ag2C2•AgNO3, 0.02g for tetryl, 0.03-0.1 g for picric acid, 0.15-0.05 for TNT, lead azide is almost the same) in general, it does not matter,
you are unlikely to hit less than 0.2-0.3 g, Ag2C2•AgNO3 is stored for a long time, although, of course, it is not as heat-resistant.
NHN is a good primary explosive, but it has its own nuances in manufacturing (a good agitator is needed), plus, like any primary explosive for safe
detonators, it requires proper pressing (from 25 to 60 MPa), at 30Mpa 0.15 g (lead azide 0.03) for PETN. But again, no one usually presses less than
0.2. And you also need the right detonator, that is, you will not be able to fill it as azide, you will need to properly seal it (ideally fill it with
epoxy).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPxdDSUGxo4 - correct synthesis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN1eK4Oyd04 - the right detonator
It's hard to advise something if the criteria are unknown. In home manufacture, reagents are still most often needed. From their presence, it
immediately becomes clear what is available to a person. For example, maybe you have silver (or its salts), but no access to acetylene. Then you can
make silver fulminate, it is more powerful than mercury fulminate and less sensitive (if properly manufactured, again). In general, there is too much
to advise.
[Edited on 31-10-2023 by DennyDevHE77]
[Edited on 31-10-2023 by DennyDevHE77] |
aaaah so the info i found weren’t accurate on Ag2C2 thanks for helping
|
|
|
Achilles
Harmless
Posts: 22
Registered: 18-9-2023
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by EF2000 | If you have copper wire, ammonia water and ammonium perchlorate, you can ditch all those primaries. And make TACP and its upgraded version CHP. They
will require metal tubes for detonators to work properly, but they are safe and really powerful.
SADS is a bit on weaker side, but it's good point is ability to detonate in very small amounts, thus high reliability.
NHN is rather unreliable alone, but can be easily upgraded with sodium chlorate and a bit of soap. Look up recent thread about that composition by
user papaya, some real blast |
again AP.. i dont have it i just have KClO4
|
|
|
ManyInterests
National Hazard
Posts: 843
Registered: 19-5-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Achilles | | Quote: Originally posted by EF2000 | If you have copper wire, ammonia water and ammonium perchlorate, you can ditch all those primaries. And make TACP and its upgraded version CHP. They
will require metal tubes for detonators to work properly, but they are safe and really powerful.
SADS is a bit on weaker side, but it's good point is ability to detonate in very small amounts, thus high reliability.
NHN is rather unreliable alone, but can be easily upgraded with sodium chlorate and a bit of soap. Look up recent thread about that composition by
user papaya, some real blast |
again AP.. i dont have it i just have KClO4 |
You can make some ammonium perchlorate from potassium perchlorate if you have ammonium sulfate/sulphate
http://www.chlorates.exrockets.com/ammper5.html
This guide should be of help.
As for me, I need to mention that I experimented with composite detonators with plastic bodies that didn't work well with NHN, even with NHN and ETN
the report was lackluster... but I did set off one 1.2g melt-cast ETN with 0.3g powdered ETN and 0.5 NHN and it was POWERFUL. Albeit I did not test it
with a witness plate.
As others have mentioned. I am experimenting with mixing NHN with some chlorates and soap. I have made 2 metal detonators with around 0.9g (I wanted
1, but some was lost due to mechnical grinding and such) of 6:4 NHN:NaClO3 and soap and another 2 from 7:3 NHN:KClO3 but with no soap and dry mixed.
I am really itching to see what happens, and to try out another one of my big detonators with a witness plate. I am really hoping for some decent
results.
| Quote: |
NHN is a good primary explosive, but it has its own nuances in manufacturing (a good agitator is needed), |
By agitator I assume you mean the chlorates, correct? I also heard that some manufacturers have mixed it with aluminum powder with great results. But
I have no information on the ratios or the process in which it was made.
|
|
|
EF2000
Hazard to Others
Posts: 109
Registered: 10-5-2023
Location: The Steppes, now trapped in the forest zone
Member Is Offline
Mood: wrooom
|
|
In fact, TACP can be made with almost any more soluble perchlorate, like NaClO4 (confession: I used LiClO4, lol, I knew it was
idiotic waste from my side, but at least I made something not hygroscopic)
| Quote: Originally posted by ManyInterests |
| Quote: |
NHN is a good primary explosive, but it has its own nuances in manufacturing (a good agitator is needed), |
By agitator I assume you mean the chlorates, correct? I also heard that some manufacturers have mixed it with aluminum powder with great results. But
I have no information on the ratios or the process in which it was made. |
Highly likely is that "agitator" means "good stirring setup", like magnetic stirrer.
Wroom wroom
|
|
|
ManyInterests
National Hazard
Posts: 843
Registered: 19-5-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | | Highly likely is that "agitator" means "good stirring setup", like magnetic stirrer. |
Oh that. Of course. I was stirring my freebased hydrazine while heating it to 60C and continued to let stir strongly (with a magnetic stirrer of
course) as I added the warmed nickle nitrate solution (with dextrin added).
|
|
|
Microtek
National Hazard
Posts: 828
Registered: 23-9-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I don't think it is desirable to add dextrin when making NHN. In my experience at least, NHN does not form large crystals the way LA does, so I don't
see what advantage the dextrin would provide.
|
|
|
DennyDevHE77
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 15-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes, I meant the magnetic stirrer.
|
|
|
ManyInterests
National Hazard
Posts: 843
Registered: 19-5-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Microtek | | I don't think it is desirable to add dextrin when making NHN. In my experience at least, NHN does not form large crystals the way LA does, so I don't
see what advantage the dextrin would provide. |
My first successful batch of NHN was done without dextrin and I guess it just needed a bit more grinding to make it a fine powder. The good thing
about NHN is that it is so insensitive to friction that there is next to no danger from grinding it. Of course utmost precaution must be taken in all
steps, but my choice of NHN (given it is the first energetic described in the exotic primaries thread) was based a lot more due to insensitivity and
stability than anything else. It is a fine initiating primary as is, but with the chlorate and soap additive it should be enough for just about
everything.
|
|
|
DennyDevHE77
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 15-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just a question to ponder. I grew large crystals of TATP for fun. Many crystals simply burned up, with a noticeable pop. But a few crystals detonated
(up to a strong ringing in the ears). But at the same time, this detonation showed almost no breezability. There was not a single trace on the wooden
table or on the linoleum after detonation. Lead azide in the same conditions left a strong dent. And this is despite the fact that the direct
destructive power (sand test) at TATP is twice as much.
Which got me thinking.
1) How can detonation produce such low power?
2) Why can TATP detonate at all? It is known that acetone peroxide can overpressurize, if I'm not mistaken, at a density of 1.222. And single crystal
has a density of 1.272. So, in theory, such acetone peroxide should not be able to detonate.
[Edited on 8-1-2024 by DennyDevHE77]
|
|
|
ManyInterests
National Hazard
Posts: 843
Registered: 19-5-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by DennyDevHE77 | Just a question to ponder. I grew large crystals of TATP for fun. Many crystals simply burned up, with a noticeable pop. But a few crystals detonated
(up to a strong ringing in the ears). But at the same time, this detonation showed almost no breezability. There was not a single trace on the wooden
table or on the linoleum after detonation. Lead azide in the same conditions left a strong dent. And this is despite the fact that the direct
destructive power (sand test) at TATP is twice as much.
Which got me thinking.
1) How can detonation produce such low power?
2) Why can TATP detonate at all? It is known that acetone peroxide can overpressurize, if I'm not mistaken, at a density of 1.222. And single crystal
has a density of 1.272. So, in theory, such acetone peroxide should not be able to detonate.
[Edited on 8-1-2024 by DennyDevHE77] |
I must say you got far more balls than me to try that with TATP. I never made any peroxide based energetic and it is unlikely that I ever will.
Energetics can be weird and unpredictable. There is a reason why Darian Ballard said in his HMTD synthesis video that while on paper, TATP has a
higher VOD, in reality HMTD is the superior initiating explosive by far. I think that in the 1943 book Chemistry of Powder and Explosives they
mention HMTD as being superior to mercury fulminate and somewhat more superior than lead azide. With a table indicating that in a reenforced cap (not
sure what is) it only took 0.08 gram to detonate TNT, with only 0.05 grams needed to set off 40% nitroglycerin dynamite.
|
|
|
DennyDevHE77
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 15-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This is something I've mentioned before in this thread.
| Quote: Originally posted by DennyDevHE77 | | and here the area of transition to detonation has a much greater influence than the velocity itself. Acetone peroxide in the form of a small mound of
powder simply flashes when ignited, sometimes with a slight pop, while lead azide, for example, detonates. Although acetone peroxide is more powerful
than lead azide, and in the case of large detonators for low-sensitivity explosives, say 5g, acetone peroxide will definitely be more effective
|
The HMTD has a narrower pre-detonation section. Lead azide transitions to detonation even faster on ignition. This is what determines the
effectiveness of the primary explosive as a primary explosive.
It's a special metal cup, it reduces the outflow of gases and so helps the combustion
the combustion to detonation. A quality cup can significantly reduce the amount of primary explosive. For example, HMTD in a paper cup can detonate
from 150 mg. In a copper cup from 4 mg. Another thing is that it does not always make sense to bother with it.
4 is the reinforced cup, 5 is the mesh, 6 and 7 are layers of styphnate and lead azide
But I was referring to something different with TATP above. Namely, a number of primary explosives (including TATP) have a dead-pressing effect, that
is, at a certain density, the burn-to-detonation time becomes so long that the primary loses its ability to detonate from a beam of fire (but it can
still detonate from other effects).
For TATP, this effect occurs at a pressing density of 1.222. That is, at this density in a cylindrical case, TATP would simply burn up like rocket
fuel. Monocrystal TATP has a density of 1.272, and in theory it cannot detonate, but for some reason it did. Although without destructive effect.
[Edited on 9-1-2024 by DennyDevHE77]
|
|
|
Microtek
National Hazard
Posts: 828
Registered: 23-9-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It is well known that many primaries can detonate from the breaking of large crystals. It is possible that what you are seeing is the crystals burning
and then breaking (perhaps due to thermal stress). This might cause detonation directly, or maybe the exposed surface area accelerates the combustion
leading to DDT (if it breaks like tempered glass maybe). This is all pure speculation.
|
|
|
Etanol
Hazard to Others
Posts: 138
Registered: 27-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by DennyDevHE77 |
1) How can detonation produce such low power?
2) Why can TATP detonate at all? It is known that acetone peroxide can overpressurize, if I'm not mistaken, at a density of 1.222. And single crystal
has a density of 1.272. So, in theory, such acetone peroxide should not be able to detonate.
|
Maybe this is incomplete truth. And in reality, the DDT of highdensity AP has a large value, but not infinite.
The low power of small single crystals is caused with a partial combustion before detonation.
Although, I do not remember low power this. Try burning 50-mg single crystal of AP )
I experimentally observed an increase in DDT with an density increase of small crystalls, but did not observe a dead pressing at hand densities.
|
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
