Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: On saponification.
White Yeti
National Hazard
****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 3-9-2011 at 15:46
On saponification.


A friend of mine, who's name shall remain unspoken, has foolishly used a relatively powerful cleaning product without gloves and now has fingerprints that are barely visible and very difficult to identify.

But he/she used what's called "non TSP cleaner", which is supposed to be less dangerous than TSP itself, and yet still as powerful against grease and other things you find in a McDonalds kitchen. I looked at the package and said it contained sodium metasilicate, better known as sodium silicate, or water glass.

So here's the question, has sodium silicate saponified the skin on my friend's fingers (rendering the fingerprints unidentifiable)?

It seems like sodium silicate cannot be as powerful as TSP, and yet, the company claims that their product is just as powerful a cleaner as TSP.

Any thoughts?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
bbartlog
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1139
Registered: 27-8-2009
Location: Unmoored in time
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-9-2011 at 16:18


Saponification is a reaction specific to fats, no? Skin on fingertips is mostly composed of other stuff. But yes, of course sodium silicate is a plenty strong base and can give you chemical burns. 'Saponification' just isn't the right word to describe them.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
magnus454
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 57
Registered: 28-2-2007
Location: Clear Lake City, TX
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-9-2011 at 18:55


He burned off his finger prints, saponification is when fats get turned into soapy like substances.



History is repeating itself.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Endimion17
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline

Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 03:20


Yeah, saponification was in order. Silicate anions hydrolize to give hydroxide anions and silicic acid. Hydroxide anions reacted with lipids in his skin.

Bases are a hell lot more dangerous for skin than acids. They penetrate better and deeper. He should visit a dermatologist because his skin still might not be safe. Fingerprints will grow back, but the skin layers need to be healed properly.
It's weird how he used it without gloves... wasn't there a "corrosive" sign?




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
White Yeti
National Hazard
****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 07:50


Thank you all so much for the info.
Magnus454, when fats become saponified, they get washed away with water, thus explaining the fact that the fingerprints are no longer visible.

I had no idea that sodium silicate was that powerful. It's sometimes sold in crystal growing kits without any warning signs. There are no warning signs on the package, but they do say "harmful if swallowed, avoid eye contact" and "may cause burns". Reading a little more, they say "wear gloves and protective clothing". Interestingly enough, they didn't say their product was "corrosive" per say.

I know that saponification specifically refers to trigycerides, but (from personal experience) I also know that even dilute solutions of strong bases can saponify the phospholipid bilayer cell membranes on the cells of the epidermis. I had an accident at school when I was performing a titration reaction, and the valve of the burette came loose and about 50mL of dilute calcium hydroxide spilled all over my hands. They felt all slippery, and the teacher explained that the cell membranes on the epidermis had been saponified.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ozone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1269
Registered: 28-7-2005
Location: Good Olde USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Integrated

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 08:20


TSP = trisodium phosphate. It is only a problem (E.G. IN THE us) when phosphates have been controlled or eliminated/banned for environmental reasons (e.g. algal proliferation, dead-zones, etc.).

Sodium silicate is a solution of silica in sodium hydroxide. The sodium hydroxide catalyzes the addition of water to the fats in you skin to yield fatty acid sodium salts (e.g. sodium strearate, myristate, laurate, etc). These compounds are soaps, and are why alkaline solutions feel slippery on the skin--the slickness is soap made from you. Because these lipids are structural, removing them destroys the tissue (lipid bylayers, etc.) leaving a chemical burn.


See also DCM or other defatting solvents which dissolve out the lipid from you skin with similar result.

FWIW, they removed the TSP from our dish washer detergent, and it began to leave spots (and buildup scale clogging the drain line), etc. I now fortify my detergent with <2 % w/w TSP acquired OTC (DAP, hardware store) and it works great :).




-Anyone who never made a mistake never tried anything new.
--Albert Einstein
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Endimion17
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline

Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 08:36


In an elementary school jargon, a salt made of a weak acid and strong base will be basic. Sodium hydroxide is one hell of a base, and silicic acid is a very, very poor acid (compare: pK<sub>a</sub>(HI) = -9.5, pK<sub>a</sub>(HNO3) = -1.4, pK<sub>a</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>S) = 7, pK<sub>a1</sub>(H<sub>4</sub>SiO<sub>4</sub>;) = 9.84, pK<sub>a2</sub>(H<sub>4</sub>SiO<sub>4</sub>;) =13.2



View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top