Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Idea
golfpro
Banned





Posts: 179
Registered: 18-5-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: Cap Sensitive

[*] posted on 6-6-2013 at 13:50
Idea


What if you took a golf club, put some ETN or other impact sensitive explosive (very small amount), in the middle of the face, got it to stick somehow, and actually hit a golf ball? The club whould have to be heavier and have a thicker face, do you think the ball would take off any faster than a normal shot?

hmmm
View user's profile View All Posts By User
cyanureeves
National Hazard
****




Posts: 737
Registered: 29-8-2010
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-6-2013 at 13:54


the PGA would not go for that.:P
View user's profile View All Posts By User
golfpro
Banned





Posts: 179
Registered: 18-5-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: Cap Sensitive

[*] posted on 6-6-2013 at 14:11


ya but how awesome would that be to see a ball fly 1000 yards and make a loud pop upon contact, just imagine. I doubt the energy would be transfered to the golf ball properly though.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemcam
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 423
Registered: 18-2-2013
Location: Atlantis
Member Is Offline

Mood: I will be gone until mid-september, on a work contract.

[*] posted on 6-6-2013 at 14:47


You could make a miniature shape charge to direct the energy towards the ball. Only safe way to test would involve a robotic arm or similar, maybe use low tech arm utilizing springs.



My YouTube Channel: ChemCamTV
IRC Channel: #sciencemadness @ irc.efnet.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Bot0nist
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1559
Registered: 15-2-2011
Location: Right behind you.
Member Is Offline

Mood: Streching my cotyledons.

[*] posted on 6-6-2013 at 15:00


This is actualy very intresting. Have you researched the "explosive pendulum" a method of comparing explosives. I do think some form of special shaped charge would be needed to direct the vast majority of the explosive force where you want it. Brisince could be an issue though. perhaps a lower velocity EM? Not really sure. I would love to see some basic proofs of concept though.

Note: editing the title to something more efficable may garner more usefull replies and attract the right views. Vauge titles are an annoyance to some, as well.

[Edited on 6-6-2013 by Bot0nist]

Make some fully nitrated cellulose, render it to laquer with acetone, and add a small blob to the center of your driver head. A tiny amount though. Wear a face sheild and swing away. Proper NC is shock sensitive to an extent. The force may be sufficient. Are you pro enough to hit the sweet spot on the first try? ;)

[Edited on 6-6-2013 by Bot0nist]




U.T.F.S.E. and learn the joys of autodidacticism!


Don't judge each day only by the harvest you reap, but also by the seeds you sow.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
franklyn
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3026
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-6-2013 at 15:15


You do realize that a club swing imparts many hundreds of times more energy
than ' a small amount ' of explosive. The golf ball will inelastically absorb much
of the explosion energy because of the speed it is released on detonation. It's
an easy experiment to place a ball over some quantity of ETN as you want and
explode it to see how high it will send the ball. It won't be impressive. The follow
through of the club transfers it's momentum to the ball at impact which for about
a thousand of a second compresses the ball quite flat on contact due to the inertia
of the ball. The ball then rebounds and moves away ahead of the club.

.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
hyfalcon
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1003
Registered: 29-3-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-6-2013 at 16:35


I can see shrapnel flying when the head comes apart from to large of a charge also.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ral123
National Hazard
****




Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-6-2013 at 21:47


Try C4. And don't forget the gloves :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
phlogiston
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1376
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline

Mood: pyrophoric

[*] posted on 7-6-2013 at 01:07


I think best-case it transfers a little momentum to the ball, but not necessarily in the intended ("forward") vector. So it will interfere with your aiming. Worst-case it destroys your club, the ball and causes some injuries.

[Edited on 7-6-2013 by phlogiston]

[Edited on 7-6-2013 by phlogiston]




-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1677
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline

Mood: dangerously practical

[*] posted on 7-6-2013 at 04:38


i think you want something much less brisant than ETN for this purpose
but infact i have wondered about if a pellet gun with forceful enough airpressure on the back of a shot would actually be capable of setting off armstrongs mixture, yielding suddenly extremely high pressure and thos hopefully much much higher speeds (:
never tried it tho, worried about breaking the gun..

but for this you might want something alike flashpowder with some initiation of a sort..
perhaps a rounded head..

one way i suggest you to test this would be with ear protection letting a charge on a golf club drop straight into a solid rock, standing ontop of the rock, and not holding it very well
POTENTIALLY the energy could throw the club backwards with great energy, if a much lighter object were to try to stop the energy from the golf club and also the ''explosive'' it should most definately work only giving a slight push on the club

in short
less brisance should work.




~25 drops = 1mL @dH2O viscocity - STP
Truth is ever growing - but without context theres barely any such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solubility_table
http://www.trimen.pl/witek/calculators/stezenia.html
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Varmint
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 264
Registered: 30-5-2013
Location: Near Atlanta, GA
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 11-6-2013 at 07:30


I think you would be rewarded with a face-full of golf ball jacket material accelerated not only by the gasses, but the stored energy of the compressed face of the ball itself.

DAS
View user's profile View All Posts By User
gregxy
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 421
Registered: 26-5-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 11-6-2013 at 09:38


Sounds like Caddyshack or Myth Busters material.....

Maybe a golf club with a piston in the face and some air and combustible liquid or H2 behind the piston. The impact would
compress the air and ignite the liquid and possibly propel the ball further. (Although I doubt that you could fit enough air
to make any difference)

Any HE will shred the ball and damage the club.
Is it still a hole in one if the ball is in 1000 pieces and just one of the pieces goes in the hole?
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top