Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: and i Thought i just bought some Toluene ...
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 16-9-2014 at 14:18


Cheers!
Any data is good for this exercise.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-9-2014 at 14:26


Methanol 64.7
Methyl acetate 57.0
Acetone 56.5
Methyl acetate / water 56.1
Methanol / acetone 55.7
Methanol / methyl acetate 53.8

Etc.



[Edited on 16-9-2014 by forgottenpassword]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 16-9-2014 at 14:32


Many thanks forgottenpassword.

It would be great to bring all the BP data for everything into one place, so anyone could look up the possibilities

I'll try to get the 'toluene' (i.e. Upper) layer distilled tomorrow and see what that brings.

Probably Benzene, and Dragon Bile.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Amos
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline

Mood: No

[*] posted on 16-9-2014 at 18:07


By any chance, do you have the name of the product you are distilling? I'd like to look into this a bit for myself.



View user's profile View All Posts By User
kt5000
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 133
Registered: 27-3-2013
Location: Southwest US
Member Is Offline

Mood: Final exams

[*] posted on 16-9-2014 at 19:52


Thanks for posting this aga. I've looked at the paint thinner aisle also, and all I find are complex mixtures like you have there. I wouldn't know where to start such a complex separation. I may give it a shot!

I was looking at a product called Strip-X, if memory serves.

[Edited on 17-9-2014 by kt5000]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 17-9-2014 at 01:00


Quote: Originally posted by kt5000  
I wouldn't know where to start such a complex separation.

Me neither, hence the simple distillation.

> I may give it a shot!
That's the Spirit (pun intended)

This tin says UN 1A1/Y1.8/100/14/E/B-1026/IMV which i need to look up.

IMG_0127.JPG - 116kB




View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 17-9-2014 at 01:29


Seems that the UN 1A1/Y1.8/100/14/E/B-1026/IMV marking is more about the Tin than it's contents.

UN = United.Nations.
1A1 = Tighthead.Steel.Drum.
Y = Packing.Group.II.6.Moderate.Hazard.
1.8 = Specific.Gravity.
100 = Kilopascal.Pressure.Rating.

source: www.myerscontainer.com/docs/POP-MCC-Section.pdf

The B-1026 seems to refer to 'Heptanes'

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UN_numbers_1201_to_1300




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
****




Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: Baffled

[*] posted on 17-9-2014 at 01:30


I found and posted a table from wikipedia, but my account was deleted! I cant find it now. But will search some more.
Basicaly I think it said you could add some Hydroxide and get the methyl acetate to gice acetone and acetic acid it also gave all the azeotropes likely

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azeotrope_%28data%29
there you go that should help

[Edited on 17-9-2014 by Little_Ghost_again]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 17-9-2014 at 02:17


Perfect LG2.
Thanks.
Sorry to unionised for not spotting the link at the bottom of the page in his earlier suggestion.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-9-2014 at 06:11


Quote: Originally posted by Little_Ghost_again  
I found and posted a table from wikipedia, but my account was deleted! I cant find it now.

That's very strange. Even all the threads you started have been completely removed, which is a damn shame because there was lots of good information in those. U2U Polverone or woelen and find out what happened.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
****




Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: Baffled

[*] posted on 17-9-2014 at 06:50


Quote: Originally posted by MrHomeScientist  
Quote: Originally posted by Little_Ghost_again  
I found and posted a table from wikipedia, but my account was deleted! I cant find it now.

That's very strange. Even all the threads you started have been completely removed, which is a damn shame because there was lots of good information in those. U2U Polverone or woelen and find out what happened.

It appears the quality of my writing was deemed spam by the protection software lol.
So I was DELETED!!!
No ones fault except maybe mine, I have asked for details via U2U of how to avoid this in the future. Yes a shame so much good information is gone but..........
Fresh start and hopefully I can avoid spamming :D. The irony of it is I posted the wikipedia link above and it was just after that I was zapped lol.
Having seen the vast quantity of spam that has apered today after the protection was disabled, it is far better I understand how to avoid the protection than it is to keep it switched off.
It is not fair on the Moderator and Admin team to have to waste so much time dealing with the huge amount of nonsense spam. So much time energy and money is spent chasing people for downloading films etc, and yet spamming is allowed to clog the internet and ruin peoples enjoyment and experience of a truly great resource such as the internet. I strongly believe that there should be severe penalties imposed on those that operate and use these bot's (intentionally).
Maybe another option is for the software to place all spam (as it see's it) into another forum, and rather than delete accounts it places a ban upon the names etc. At least then there is a chance for resurrection when the odd inevitable mistake is made.
LG
View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 17-9-2014 at 06:59


Quote: Originally posted by Little_Ghost_again  
It appears the quality of my writing was deemed spam by the protection software l

Really ?!?

I'm doomed :(

Today i started distilling the Upper layer, and stopped after 20 minutes because the VT stuck at 63 C all the way through.

Stuffing all the Wiki azeotrope BP data into a spreadsheet, the candidates for a BP of 63 +/- 1 C are :-

chloroform
n-propyl bromide + ethanol
ethyl acetate + methanol
toluene + methanol
n-octane + methanol
tetrachloroethylene + methanol
acetonitrile + methanol
isopropanol + methanol
n-hexane + isopropanol
n-hexane + tetrahydrofuran
cyclohexane + ethanol
cyclohexane + methyl ethyl ketone

As it is stated on the Tin that it is a mixture, forgottenpassword's suggestion that it is most likely an azeotrope, or complex mix of azeotropes fits very well.

NTODN is also right, in that the 63 C fraction cannot be cholorform, as it ignites very easily.

The layer that floated on water appears to be a mix of toluene + methanol, seeing as they fit the BP, and are already stated to be in there.

Next is splitting the Toluene & Methanol ...

Surprisingly this mix might be split using water as an entrainer :
www.ijcps.org/issue7/p2.pdf

There is also is a 'polydimethylsiloxane' membrane which seems to separate out the methanol.

Haven't got one of those.

Making some CaCl2 instead.

[Edited on 17-9-2014 by aga]

[Edited on 17-9-2014 by aga]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Praxichys
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Coprecipitated

[*] posted on 17-9-2014 at 10:57


Wash repeatedly in water.

Methanol is miscible with water in all proportions. Only half a gram of toluene will dissolve in a liter of water at 20C.

Shake your mixture vigorously with about the same volume of water, discard the water, and repeat 4 or 5 times. This will remove essentially all of the methanol from the toluene. Shake the toluene over anhydrous CaCl2 to remove the last traces of methanol and water. Filter out the CaCl2 and distill. You will then have reasonably dry and pure toluene.

You can obtain your toluene by using this same process on the 'Super Disolvente' directly, without distilling first, since AcOH, MeOAc, and acetone are all very soluble in water, although you may have to perform the wash a few more times - perhaps 6 or 7.

[Edited on 17-9-2014 by Praxichys]




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 17-9-2014 at 11:05


Fantastic ! Thanks very much for that.

As the saying goes, Praxichys makes Perfect !

Edit:

Just HAD to go give that a try straight away.
Interesting result.

100ml 'Disolvente' in a 250ml sep funnel with 100ml DDIW.
Immediately two layers appeared.

On shaking vigorously, a milky white liquid occurs.
Left to stand for a few seconds, a slightly milky top layer formed fast, with the bottom layer less milky.

Draw off the bottom layer, add 100ml DDIW, shake, wait, draw off bottom layer.
Repeat 4 times.

At iteration 5, the Top layer became Clear, and the lower layer milky with tiny, but visible droplets.

Subsequent iterations yield the same, with the Top layer perfectly clear, which i took to be the point at which i could stop adding, shaking etc, as the toluene is now as 'clean' as it can be with this water process.

Lesson learned : wait for advice from someone who actually has done this before and knows what to do !

[Edited on 17-9-2014 by aga]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top