Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Is bracken fern carcinogenic when smoked?
Cerberus
Harmless
*




Posts: 7
Registered: 8-3-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-3-2007 at 22:14
Is bracken fern carcinogenic when smoked?


Firstly, thanks to everyone who helped me out on my previous question. If one were to smoke bracken fern, could its active carcinogen, Ptaquiloside, still be carcinogenic...or does heat denature it?....i ask this because i find that carcinogens when heated gvenerally become more powerful, but i cant understand how something can be completely burnt up and still be able to perform the mechanism which alters DNA. Thanks again
View user's profile View All Posts By User
UnintentionalChaos
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1454
Registered: 9-12-2006
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline

Mood: Nucleophilic

[*] posted on 22-3-2007 at 22:44


Smoke? As in there is some crazy theory going around that it's a drug? If so, I can't possibly concieve what in it would have any effects. People worldwide eat this as a food. This would be as bad as the whole banana peel rumor and the sassafras leaf crap (its the thickening agent in Louisiana gumbo for crying out loud). Maybe that isn't what you meant, so I'm sorry if it wasn't.

I looked up the structure and I'm not sure too sure if the molecule would be easily susceptible to heat damage or if the compound can vaporize and enter the body that way. Seeing as how it is half glucose, it would probably burn instead of vaporizing, though. As for carcinogens, hell, grilled food is carcinogenic. Smoke is carcinogenic. Bracken is not really high up there on the list to start with anyway.

[Edited on 3-23-07 by UnintentionalChaos]

[Edited on 3-23-07 by UnintentionalChaos]




Department of Redundancy Department - Now with paperwork!

'In organic synthesis, we call decomposition products "crap", however this is not a IUPAC approved nomenclature.' -Nicodem
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chochu3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 185
Registered: 21-10-2003
Location: South Side Tejas [Cloverland]
Member Is Offline

Mood: Inside looking out

[*] posted on 22-3-2007 at 23:07


Substances all have different vapor pressures, so when heated they go into gas form. They can be over heated and turn into carbon which in that case will leave them unactive (alkaloids).



\"Abiding in the midst of ignorance, thinking themselves wise and learned, fools go aimlessly hither and thither, like blind led by the blind.\" - Katha Upanishad
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DrP
National Hazard
****




Posts: 625
Registered: 28-9-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: exothermic

[*] posted on 23-3-2007 at 02:28


Quote:
Originally posted by Cerberus
i cant understand how something can be completely burnt up and still be able to perform the mechanism which alters DNA.


I've always understood it as the free radicals in the smoke that are so reactive they damage and alter things (like lung tissue). When a substance is burnt the molecules are all smashed to bits leaving lots of reactive broken radicals which are very bad for you. Ok, in compleate combustion of hydrocarbons for example we get get CO2 and water, but nothing is really that perfect - the smoke always contains lots of broken half reacted molecules just waiting to further react with something.

I was wrong about nicotine being a carcinogen (just highly toxic) so I am suddenly lacking confidence in my knowledge of this, but I am pretty confident it's the free radicals that are to blame in the smoke.

As an after thought - The fact they are in the smoke may also suggest that they are hot - thus this will further inrease their reactivity (faster moving molecules) and their ability to damage.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
12AX7
Post Harlot
*****




Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline

Mood: informative

[*] posted on 23-3-2007 at 08:19


Yeah, but the smoke cools down and reacts with itself.

If free radicals and heat were the concern rather than anything in the tobacco, mouth cancer would be much more common in smokers than chewers.

Tim




Seven Transistor Labs LLC http://seventransistorlabs.com/
Electronic Design, from Concept to Layout.
Need engineering assistance? Drop me a message!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5104
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-3-2007 at 06:07


There are lots of carcinogenic compounds in smoke; formaldehdyde, benzopyran and N nitroso amines for a start.
There's no good reason to assume that the ptaquiloside from bracken would be totally destroyed (after all, enough nicotine survives smoking to keep people hooked) so that would add to the brew. Breathing smoke is bad for you, starting with a toxic plant won't help.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pyridinium
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 258
Registered: 18-5-2005
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: cupric

[*] posted on 25-3-2007 at 08:23


Quote:
Originally posted by Cerberus
but i cant understand how something can be completely burnt up and still be able to perform the mechanism which alters DNA.


Quite simple: it's not completely burnt up.

There's a big difference between a smoldering cigarette and a roaring, oxygen-fed incinerator.

Example:

Pyrolysis of benzene -----------> biphenyl + other products

Complete combustion of benzene ---------------> CO2 + H2O

Tell me you're not really going to smoke a fern.

If it's a friend, please discourage him.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Cerberus
Harmless
*




Posts: 7
Registered: 8-3-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-3-2007 at 22:39


Pyridinium
Certainly not....i ask in relation to a research project im currently doing.....im just trying to find information on various aspects of the substance......
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pyridinium
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 258
Registered: 18-5-2005
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: cupric

[*] posted on 26-3-2007 at 09:29


Quote:
Originally posted by Cerberus
Pyridinium
Certainly not....i ask in relation to a research project im currently doing.....im just trying to find information on various aspects of the substance......


I wasn't trying to be condescending, I just couldn't resist. The title of the thread was like a beacon.

A study of the pyrolysis products of bracken fern would be quite interesting. I'd love to hear the results of spec analysis, if available. Keep us posted on your results.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Cerberus
Harmless
*




Posts: 7
Registered: 8-3-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 28-3-2007 at 22:23


an enormous amount of information can be found on pubmed....i have another question, but ill create a new posting...have a look
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pyridinium
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 258
Registered: 18-5-2005
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: cupric

[*] posted on 29-3-2007 at 11:49


Quote:
Originally posted by Cerberus
an enormous amount of information can be found on pubmed....i have another question, but ill create a new posting...have a look


I'm not sure what "pubmed" you're using, but a search for "bracken" and "pyrolysis" on pubmed returns 0 results.

It makes me wonder why you asked us about this, if you didn't need the information in the first place?

Ptaquiloside is a glucoside, which gives a good starting place for the chemistry of heat breakdown. But you already knew that.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top