Chemophiliac
Harmless
Posts: 18
Registered: 1-6-2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: In the mood for some chemistry!!
|
|
Complexing of Group 4 and Group 5 Elements
does anyone have any info about the complexing of group 4 and group 5 elements? All I know is that Ti has a coordination number of 6. What are the
most common coordination numbers of these elements? I assume V is also most commonly 6?
Additionally, I'm just curious as well about the complexing of W and Mo, I know that Cr has coordination number 6 so I assume both are similar but I
know that Mo and W can both have more bonds.
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
I do know that Ti forms a strong, stable peroxo- complex. Dissolve titanium metal in sulfuric acid, giving a purple solution (Ti(3+) hydrato-, if I'm
not mistaken), then add peroxide, giving a bright red solution. Alternately, dissolve metal in hydrochloric (slow, if at all), giving a light purple
solution, and add peroxide.
Most form the usual complexes with lone pairs, like nitrogens, but getting them there may not be as easy. Titanium is oxygen-hungry. I do recall
tungsten makes an interesting "paddlewheel" complex, with four bipyridine units, a metal-metal quadruple bond, and two extra bonds allowing for redox
(sticking on chloride, say). It's got the lowest work function of anything, apparently...
Edit: hpp.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Di-tungsten_tetra%28hpp%29
Tim
[Edited on 6-3-2007 by 12AX7]
|
|
Pyridinium
Hazard to Others
Posts: 258
Registered: 18-5-2005
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: cupric
|
|
Zr, Nb, and Ta form some complex anions with coordination number of 7, and also Ta forms one with coord. no. of 8. These are complexes with F, as far
as I know.
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7977
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
The second and third row elements have a much more limited aqueous chemistry in low oxidation states and their coordination chemistry is more
complicated. They hardly form simply aqua ions. They do form oxo-anions at high oxidation states (niobates, tungstates, molybdates) and at lower
oxidation states, polynuclear complexes can be formed with direct metal-metal links, but making such complexes usually requires rather special
conditions, such as special non-aqueous solvents, inert atmosphere and whatever other special things, which are not easily done at a simple (home)lab.
|
|
Pyridinium
Hazard to Others
Posts: 258
Registered: 18-5-2005
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: cupric
|
|
The fluoro complexes of Ta, Nb, etc. require dissolving the oxides in concentrated HF, then adding extra NaF or KF, so they are definitely not a good
home chemistry project.
|
|
Dr. Beaker
Hazard to Others
Posts: 132
Registered: 9-9-2005
Location: between the med red and dead
Member Is Offline
Mood: Shaken, not stirred
|
|
This is such a wide subject...
Ti (IV) for example can be tetra coordinative (TiCl4, TiOMe4, TiCPCl2 and so on) and have a tetrahedral shape, it can also be pentacoordinative (like
in the anion TiCl5-) and offcourse octahedral.
The tri coordinative cation TiCp2Me+ is the active species in the homogenous ziegler nata olefin polymerization.
|
|
Chemophiliac
Harmless
Posts: 18
Registered: 1-6-2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: In the mood for some chemistry!!
|
|
Hmm... very interesting. It sounds like the cordination chemistry of these elements can be quite complex, hence my confusion regarding which is the
most common coordination numbers of these elements. Where an element like Zinc, having a tetrahedral shaped 4-ccordinate system that dominates over
all other coordination numbers and complex shapes (4 coordinate tetrahedral is all I know of that Zinc has). So in this case, the nature of the
ligands and their ability to split the crystal field of the metal is extremely effective at changing the coordination numbers of these elements.
|
|