Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2    4  
Author: Subject: Bromide to bromine???
Molecular Manipulations
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 447
Registered: 17-12-2014
Location: The Garden of Eden
Member Is Offline

Mood: High on forbidden fruit

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 07:35


Quote: Originally posted by j_sum1  
Good point.
Amazing how easy it is to overlook the obvious.

(But then if you are doing that, you could always do electrolysis of NaBr!!) (Overlooked by both of us :D And everyone who read what I wrote without catching the glitch. :D:D)

Literally overlooked by you. MrHomescientist linked a video by him on it earlier in this thread. I personally dislike most electrolysis isolations, but that's just me. They take a long time, are usually open to air and thus can get contaminated, plus my MMO gets degraded by bromine, and I hate using carbon rods.




-The manipulator
We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know. -W. H. Auden
View user's profile View All Posts By User
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 08:51


One might be able to form bromine by melting and then distilling a mixture of ferric nitrate nonahydrate (melting point 47.2 °C) with a bromide salt. The hypothetical reaction for the sodium salt, for example, that I'm thinking of would correspond to:

10NaBr(s) + 4Fe(NO3)3.9H2O(l) + heat => 4FeOOH(s) + 32H2O(l) + 10NaNO3(aq) + 5Br2(g) + 2NO(g)

There could be some contamination with nitrosyl bromide as there is an equilibrium between bromine and nitric oxide.

Again, heed the warning of the EXTREME toxicity and corrosiveness of some of the hypothetical products! Chemical pneumonitis is easily induced from these gases even in very small amounts.

[Edited on 23-2-2015 by deltaH]




Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 10:00


Quote: Originally posted by deltaH  

10NaBr(s) + 4Fe(NO3)3.9H2O(l) => 4FeOOH(s) + 32H2O(l) + 10NaNO3(aq) + 5Br2(g) + 2NO(g)



I doubt if that would work. The low temperature works against it, I think.

When the ferric nitrate nonahydrate 'melts' it essentially dissolves into its own crystal water. Nitrate ions alone can't oxidise bromide (better check that against a reduction potentials table!).

Edit:

NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> + 4 H<sup>+</sup> + 3 e ===> NO + 2 H2O

Ered = + 0.95 V

Br<sup>-</sup> ===> 1/2 Br<sub>2</sub> + e

Eox = - 1.07 V

So E = Ered + Eox = - 0.12 V < 0

Which suggests this won't work. Oxidation with nitrates at higher temperatures might work by removing volatile Br vapours.

[Edited on 23-2-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 10:12


Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
Quote: Originally posted by deltaH  

10NaBr(s) + 4Fe(NO3)3.9H2O(l) => 4FeOOH(s) + 32H2O(l) + 10NaNO3(aq) + 5Br2(g) + 2NO(g)



I doubt if that would work. The low temperature works against it, I think.

When the ferric nitrate nonahydrate 'melts' it essentially dissolves into its own crystal water. Nitrate ions alone can't oxidise bromide (better check that against a reduction potentials table!).


Surprisingly, I had done a reaction where a chloride salt was heated with molten Fe(NO3)3.9H2O. This produced a very noxious gas with a strong chlorine odour, so I suspected formation of at least some chlorine or nitrosyl chloride (which can decompose to chlorine anyhow in an equilibrium with NO) and or NOx.

If that was the case, then the bromide version should proceed more readily.

But again, the product might be contaminated by the other gases [or not].

Quote:
Edit:

NO3- + 4 H+ + 3 e ===> NO + 2 H2O

Ered = + 0.95 V

Br- ===> 1/2 Br2 + e

Eox = - 1.07 V

So E = Ered + Eox = - 0.12 V < 0

Which suggests this won't work. Oxidation with nitrates at higher temperatures might work by removing volatile Br vapours.


Those reduction potentials are very close blogfast.

I don't know what would happen if one used nitric acid and a bromide salt as is, the reason for stating the iron nitrate version is because of that experimental observation I had (chlorine case).

With aqua regia, there is also a complex equilibrium between nitric acid, water, hydrochloric acid, nitrosyl chloride, NOx and chlorine that is suggestive (chlorine case).

Finally, this route of using ferric nitrate sticks to the spirit of the thread, i.e. avoiding the use of liquid acids. However, nitric acid can be considered to be generated in situ by the easy decomposition of ferric nitrate.

[Edited on 23-2-2015 by deltaH]




Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 12:06


E = 0 V does mean K approx. 1. Maybe a bit of sodium bisulphate would help too.



View user's profile View All Posts By User
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 12:17


Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
E = 0 V does mean K approx. 1. Maybe a bit of sodium bisulphate would help too.

Why?

Thinking of the fused sodium bromide + sodium nitrate + sodium bisulfate variant?

Could work, at high temperatures, nitrosyl bromide is probably not favoured thermodynamically, so generated NOx should pass straight through the condenser in part (aside from what is soluble in bromine).

However, generating HBr instead is a competing parallel reaction that could be a big problem with the addition of "dry acid".

Would you be in a position to safely try out the ferric nitrate version I have described by any chance?

[Edited on 23-2-2015 by deltaH]




Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Molecular Manipulations
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 447
Registered: 17-12-2014
Location: The Garden of Eden
Member Is Offline

Mood: High on forbidden fruit

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 16:30


How about a dry method? Again theoretical:
2 NaBr + Ca(OCl)2 + Mg --> Br2 + 2 NaCl + CaO + MgO.
I haven't yet checked out the Gibbs Free Energy for this, everything is forming a very stable ionic compound, except bromine. Could this work?




-The manipulator
We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know. -W. H. Auden
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 17:39


Quote: Originally posted by deltaH  
Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
E = 0 V does mean K approx. 1. Maybe a bit of sodium bisulphate would help too.

Why?

Thinking of the fused sodium bromide + sodium nitrate + sodium bisulfate variant?



No, I was still thinking of your ferric nitrate nonahydrate idea.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 17:42


Quote: Originally posted by Molecular Manipulations  
How about a dry method? Again theoretical:
2 NaBr + Ca(OCl)2 + Mg --> Br2 + 2 NaCl + CaO + MgO.
I haven't yet checked out the Gibbs Free Energy for this, everything is forming a very stable ionic compound, except bromine. Could this work?


ΔG almost certainly quite negative. But possibly a can of worms in terms of byproducts, I think, not sure...

Interesting thought though. :cool: Might want to add a low melting flux to promote contact.

Or why not leave out the Mg altogether? Ca(ClO)2 is a strong oxidiser as such.

NaBr + Ca(ClO)2 === > NaCl + CaO + 1/2 Br2

('I may be a dreamer but I'm not the only one...' ;))

[Edited on 24-2-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Molecular Manipulations
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 447
Registered: 17-12-2014
Location: The Garden of Eden
Member Is Offline

Mood: High on forbidden fruit

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 20:20


Because if you look closely you'll notice that can't be balanced, there's two oxygens and two chlorines in calcium hypochlorite, no matter how you try it, either oxygen or chlorine must evolve. Chlorine is in the +1 oxidation state (I know, oxidation states don't really exist), hence the necessary reducing agent.

[Edited on 24-2-2015 by Molecular Manipulations]




-The manipulator
We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know. -W. H. Auden
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 20:31


Quote: Originally posted by Molecular Manipulations  
Because if you look closely you'll notice that can't be balanced, there's two oxygens and two chlorines in calcium hypochlorite, no matter how you try it, either oxygen or chlorine must evolve. Chlorine is in the +1 oxidation state (I know, oxidation states don't really exist), hence the necessary reducing agent.

[Edited on 24-2-2015 by Molecular Manipulations]


Ooopsie. That Brandy and Coke is taking its toll. :D




View user's profile View All Posts By User
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 23-2-2015 at 22:22


I don't think it's a good idea to add magnesium to an oxidant if you desire to make bromine.



Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 06:21


Quote: Originally posted by deltaH  
I don't think it's a good idea to add magnesium to an oxidant if you desire to make bromine.


Flash powder alert!




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Molecular Manipulations
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 447
Registered: 17-12-2014
Location: The Garden of Eden
Member Is Offline

Mood: High on forbidden fruit

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 07:17


Quote: Originally posted by deltaH  
I don't think it's a good idea to add magnesium to an oxidant if you desire to make bromine.

I was thinking the same because of magnesium oxide contamination. Is this why, or some other reason? Glass wool could be use at the neck of the flask to stop some of it, but it would probably need to be distilled twice.
Of course it could just not work, or go way too fast.
Or the magnesium oxidation could be fast, but it would take a while for chlorine to oxidize bromide, I think the sodium bromide would need to be fused, and even still it will take a while.

[Edited on 24-2-2015 by Molecular Manipulations]




-The manipulator
We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know. -W. H. Auden
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 07:49


Quote: Originally posted by Molecular Manipulations  
How about a dry method? Again theoretical:
2 NaBr + Ca(OCl)2 + Mg --> Br2 + 2 NaCl + CaO + MgO.


How about replacing that 'nasty' Mg with something a bit tamer like Zn?

Mg with chlorates is explosive, not sure about with molten hypochlorites.

I don't get your point about MgO: magnesium powder is pretty stable and forgiving.

[Edited on 24-2-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Metacelsus
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2532
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 07:50


Instead of adding magnesium, what about adding an acid?



As below, so above.

My blog: https://denovo.substack.com
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 07:52


Quote: Originally posted by Cheddite Cheese  
Instead of adding magnesium, what about adding an acid?


Equation?




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Molecular Manipulations
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 447
Registered: 17-12-2014
Location: The Garden of Eden
Member Is Offline

Mood: High on forbidden fruit

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 08:19


It's just a matter of avoiding contamination, magnesia is very stable, I just don't want it in my bromine.
Zinc seems like a good idea, it would melt easily and not react to fast. Also whether zinc or magnesium it won't be powdered, probably chips, so flash powder isn't going to happen.
As for Cheese's acid, first, this entire point is not to use acid, if acid was to be considered I'd just use the regular acid + bromide + oxidizer.
Besides, calcium oxide will react with acids...

[EDIT] Shouldn't this be is R and A Acquisition I've already waisted so many posts here that I'm now most active in 'beginnings'... [shudder]

[Edited on 24-2-2015 by Molecular Manipulations]




-The manipulator
We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know. -W. H. Auden
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 08:23


Quote: Originally posted by Molecular Manipulations  
It's just a matter of avoiding contamination, magnesia is very stable, I just don't want it in my bromine.


But how would it get in there? You distil off the bromine, so the worst that can happen is mechanical entrainment and that can happen with the other reaction products too.

Sodium bisulphate is a salt. ;)

[Edited on 24-2-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 08:33


What's wrong with ferric nitrate and bromide salt route?



Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Molecular Manipulations
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 447
Registered: 17-12-2014
Location: The Garden of Eden
Member Is Offline

Mood: High on forbidden fruit

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 08:40


Yeah, I was referring to mechanical 'entrainment'. I had the image of flash powder in the back of my mind when I wrote that, it makes a lot of fine magnesium oxide dust (among other things). I guess if the reaction is slow this might not be a problem.
You're quite right, sodium bisulfate is indeed a salt, and an acidic one at that. Is there a point to that, or are just saying words now?:D
Tin tetrachloride is a covalent liquid...




-The manipulator
We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know. -W. H. Auden
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 08:44


Quote: Originally posted by Molecular Manipulations  
Is there a point to that, or are just saying words now?:D


The emoticon should have been a bit of a giveaway (it was a joke, i.o.w.)

Post with 'you can't use XYZ' never have much sway with me. NaHSO4 is a case in point: so OTC no one can reasonably object to recommending it in an amateur synthesis.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 08:45


Quote: Originally posted by deltaH  
What's wrong with ferric nitrate and bromide salt route?


We've already discussed that, no?

Quote: Originally posted by deltaH  
Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
Quote: Originally posted by deltaH  

10NaBr(s) + 4Fe(NO3)3.9H2O(l) => 4FeOOH(s) + 32H2O(l) + 10NaNO3(aq) + 5Br2(g) + 2NO(g)



I doubt if that would work. The low temperature works against it, I think.

When the ferric nitrate nonahydrate 'melts' it essentially dissolves into its own crystal water. Nitrate ions alone can't oxidise bromide (better check that against a reduction potentials table!).


Surprisingly, I had done a reaction where a chloride salt was heated with molten Fe(NO3)3.9H2O. This produced a very noxious gas with a strong chlorine odour, so I suspected formation of at least some chlorine or nitrosyl chloride (which can decompose to chlorine anyhow in an equilibrium with NO) and or NOx.

If that was the case, then the bromide version should proceed more readily.

But again, the product might be contaminated by the other gases [or not].

Quote:
Edit:

NO3- + 4 H+ + 3 e ===> NO + 2 H2O

Ered = + 0.95 V

Br- ===> 1/2 Br2 + e

Eox = - 1.07 V

So E = Ered + Eox = - 0.12 V < 0

Which suggests this won't work. Oxidation with nitrates at higher temperatures might work by removing volatile Br vapours.


Those reduction potentials are very close blogfast.

I don't know what would happen if one used nitric acid and a bromide salt as is, the reason for stating the iron nitrate version is because of that experimental observation I had (chlorine case).

With aqua regia, there is also a complex equilibrium between nitric acid, water, hydrochloric acid, nitrosyl chloride, NOx and chlorine that is suggestive (chlorine case).

Finally, this route of using ferric nitrate sticks to the spirit of the thread, i.e. avoiding the use of liquid acids. However, nitric acid can be considered to be generated in situ by the easy decomposition of ferric nitrate.

[Edited on 23-2-2015 by deltaH]


Without some source of H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup> that won't work too well, if you rely on the 'classic' oxidising power of nitrates.

Also, why ferric nitrate hydrate? Why not Al nitrate hydrate?


[Edited on 24-2-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 09:10


Quote:


Without some source of H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup> that won't work too well, if you rely on the 'classic' oxidising power of nitrates.

Also, why ferric nitrate hydrate? Why not Al nitrate hydrate?


Ferric nitrate solutions are highly acidic. Also ferric nitrate is not very stable, tending to decompose to ferric oxide/hydroxide and so generating nitric acid, even on gentle heating. Plus, you're overlooking that I've had encouraging results with the chloride version.

As for the aluminium nitrate, in principle that could also work, but ferric nitrate is easier to obtain IMHO and not as aggressive as aluminium nitrate.


[Edited on 24-2-2015 by deltaH]




Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-2-2015 at 09:20


Quote: Originally posted by deltaH  
Ferric nitrate solutions are highly acidic. Also ferric nitrate is not very stable, tending to decompose to ferric oxide/hydroxide and so generating nitric acid, even on gentle heating. Plus, you're overlooking that I've had encouraging results with the chloride version.

As for the aluminium nitrate, in principle that could also work, but ferric nitrate is easier to obtain IMHO and not as aggressive as aluminium nitrate.




Al nitrate hydrate melts easily too, as well as being quite acidic too. All highly charged cations hydrolyse.

Test, test, test! :D

[Edited on 24-2-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  2    4  

  Go To Top