Jylliana
Hazard to Others
Posts: 126
Registered: 3-10-2014
Location: The Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bubbly ^-^
|
|
Black gunk that should be NaNO3
I did something... well.. not really stupid imo, but a little stupid.
I tried to neutralize my 65% nitric acid solution, so I added a few spoons full of sodium carbonate... but the pH crept up too slowly, so I proceeded
by adding sodium hydroxide... and then this happened:
It started to boil very quickly and violently and some sticky black gunk formed. It looks a bit like molten rubber.
The rise in temperature actually made my plastic, teflon coated stir bar all flimsy, like it melted or something, and on cooling down it went back to
it's original state.
Internet stated that this reaction should yield NaNO3, but that stuff is white, and this was black.
Does anyone know what happened?
PS The solution also had copper ions present(I dissolved metallic copper in the acid), but I don't know if that influenced the reaction.
[Edited on 3-12-2014 by Jylliana]
|
|
|
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I don't know any copper chemistry, but surely that explains it: you've made some black copper compound. If there was only a little in there perhaps
you can recrystallize the sodium nitrate using a suitable solvent. What that solvent is, I couldn't tell you.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
If there was any extra un-neutralized Na2CO3 this would be a source of carbon. At high temperature this can lead to black gunk.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Bert
|
Thread Moved
3-12-2014 at 06:16 |
Jylliana
Hazard to Others
Posts: 126
Registered: 3-10-2014
Location: The Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bubbly ^-^
|
|
Of course... simple redox chemistry... why didn't I think of that >.<
Copper oxide is black 
[Edited on 3-12-2014 by Jylliana]
|
|
|
Jylliana
Hazard to Others
Posts: 126
Registered: 3-10-2014
Location: The Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bubbly ^-^
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Magpie  | | If there was any extra un-neutralized Na2CO3 this would be a source of carbon. At high temperature this can lead to black gunk.
|
Maybe, but is nitric acid able to convert the carbonate to elemental carbon?
[Edited on 3-12-2014 by Jylliana]
|
|
|
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If you have finished neutralizing the solution, perhaps you can dissolve it in hot water and filter out the black precipitate. If that clears up your
solution you can boil it down a little then dry it over a low heat. You will probably need to find a recrystallization solvent to clean it up to an
acceptable level; but I'm sure that that will be easily achieved.
[Edited on 3-12-2014 by forgottenpassword]
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
Welcome to the wonderful world of chemistry. There are no failed experiments, just unexpected learning opportunities!
Just looked at the biographical information in your profile-
You are involved in high school level science teaching as a technician? You have graduated both high school and some sort of college or technical
school?
Could you please leave your original post unedited, but now write your exact lab procedure, explaining your intent and actions, providing
stoichiometric information.
You proceeded on the basis of: | Quote: | | Internet stated that this reaction should yield NaNO3 |
Please provide a link to your source.
After you write this up to include the level of information required, I will be happy to move the thread out of "beginnings"!
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
Jylliana
Hazard to Others
Posts: 126
Registered: 3-10-2014
Location: The Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bubbly ^-^
|
|
Procedure:
- Add 50ml 65% nitric acid to a beaker
- With a spatula, add a few grams of metallic copper(turnings).
- When the reaction is finished, add three or four tablespoons of sodium carbonate.
- Stir until dissolved
- Add one tablespoon of sodium hydroxide to the solution
I did all of this because I always neutralize solutions before I throw them in the (heavy metals) waste bin.
I didn’t measure out everything precisely, I described my actions precisely the way I actually did my experiment.
The conclusion that this reaction should yield NaNO3 is from this source:
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081031171657A...
When I wrote that part of my post, I hadn’t thought of the copper ions in solution yet, that’s why I looked up ‘HNO3 + NaOH’.
-
Yes, I am a School Science Technician. I finished High School and also went to college in Analytical Chemistry, and took extra classes to prepare me
for working at a school.
I hope this is enough information.
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
| Quote: | | I didn’t measure out everything precisely, I described my actions precisely the way I actually did my experiment. |
An EXPERIMENT is an orderly procedure carried out with the goal of verifying, refuting, or establishing the validity of a hypothesis.
What was your hypothesis? By what standards would you have considered it to have been validated???
An orderly process would include measuring all reactants and keeping notes. Measuring of dry chemicals would be by weight, not "3 or 4 tablespoons"
Children might mix some unmeasured chemicals in a beaker with the vague intent of having "something happen". If you are an adult, a college educated
chemist and work as a technician- Something seems very odd in all of this, 12 year old self taught members here will conduct operations in a more
rational way.
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
More likely it would go to CO2.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Redox chemistry? Where is the oxidation and the reduction? (There's none, it was a rhetorical question)
Redox, no, reductionist, probably. 
During addition of alkali, Cu(OH)2 formed + neutralisation heat. Heat + Cu(OH)2 = CuO, as already noted.
|
|
|
Jylliana
Hazard to Others
Posts: 126
Registered: 3-10-2014
Location: The Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bubbly ^-^
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Bert |
| Quote: | | I didn’t measure out everything precisely, I described my actions precisely the way I actually did my experiment. |
An EXPERIMENT is an orderly procedure carried out with the goal of verifying, refuting, or establishing the validity of a hypothesis.
What was your hypothesis? By what standards would you have considered it to have been validated???
An orderly process would include measuring all reactants and keeping notes. Measuring of dry chemicals would be by weight, not "3 or 4 tablespoons"
Children might mix some unmeasured chemicals in a beaker with the vague intent of having "something happen". If you are an adult, a college educated
chemist and work as a technician- Something seems very odd in all of this, 12 year old self taught members here will conduct operations in a more
rational way.
|
Fine, not an experiment. I didn't research anything. I expected the solution to be neutralized with an excess NaOH or carbonate. That is all.
And as far as I know, an excess is an excess, whether it's 50mg or 10 grams... still an excess. Thats why I used spoonfulls and not grams.
And I would appreciate it if you'd use a friendlier tone in your posts. I did not mean any harm and I always try my best to think before doing. We
can't all be super smart people who anticipate every tiny problem.
|
|
|
Jylliana
Hazard to Others
Posts: 126
Registered: 3-10-2014
Location: The Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bubbly ^-^
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25 |
Redox chemistry? Where is the oxidation and the reduction? (There's none, it was a rhetorical question)
Redox, no, reductionist, probably.
During addition of alkali, Cu(OH)2 formed + neutralisation heat. Heat + Cu(OH)2 = CuO, as already noted. |
Precipitation reaction, then? I don't know... I'm getting more confused by the minute.
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
I must apologize for my overly critical and narrow interpretations of your statements-
Mere words. No reason to be so fussy on exact definition in a scientific context! We all can fill in any small lacunae.
Speaking (writing?!) of words, I wish to complement you on your perfect use of the English language, and fitting use of USA standard idiom and
phrasing. It is so rare for a person using English as a second language to use it as you do, with absolutely no trace of the sentence structure or
idiom of their "milk tongue". It is a profound skill, especially in one so young.
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'll chime in with another confirmation that it is copper(II) oxide. Your copper nitrate solution precipitated copper carbonate and hydroxide upon
addition of the various bases, and the high heat decomposed the hydroxide to black CuO. I'm actually planning on using this reaction (in a more
controlled manner) this weekend to introduce some kids to chemistry.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Bert |
It is so rare for a person using English as a second language to use it as you do, with absolutely no trace of the sentence structure or idiom of
their "milk tongue". It is a profound skill, especially in one so young.
|
Yes, it is awesome. Garage chemist, a German forum member, also has this skill.
Jylliana, can you speak fluently in US idiom as well? Do you have an American accent, or is it British, or is it Dutch?
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
It's a very common high school or college introductory chemistry lab-
I recall doing it myself, back when high school kids in USA were allowed to handle more "interesting" reagents .
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4282
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
I'm sure she doesn't have an accent at all.
(Actually, people are usually very bad at judging their own accents, or lack thereof, so you might not a useful answer to that question. I once
worked with a French woman who told me, "You 'ave zee vairy stonk akSENT. Zee peepl 'oo teach me Eeng-lessh, zhey 'ave no akSENT.")
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
I remember that lab! It happened just a month or two before I started home chemistry, and it's part of the reason I wanted to start in the first
place.
And it might be a good idea to be a little more accepting and constructive towards newer members; the last thing we need is to drive people away from
what is probably an already shrinking field. I was terrified of you veteran users when I first joined the forum.
|
|
|
Jylliana
Hazard to Others
Posts: 126
Registered: 3-10-2014
Location: The Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bubbly ^-^
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Magpie | | Quote: Originally posted by Bert |
It is so rare for a person using English as a second language to use it as you do, with absolutely no trace of the sentence structure or idiom of
their "milk tongue". It is a profound skill, especially in one so young.
|
Yes, it is awesome. Garage chemist, a German forum member, also has this skill.
Jylliana, can you speak fluently in US idiom as well? Do you have an American accent, or is it British, or is it Dutch? |
Here is a video I narrated for Rador Labs. You can hear my voice there, if you're interested.
I gotta add, I was nervous for this video. My day-to-day english is a bit more fluent and I normally don't stutter.
Bert, thanks for the compliment  . I got my english skills from watching too many
american sitcoms and movies 
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes. A simple precipitation followed by thermal dehydration of the precipitated hydroxide. A bit unexpected in your experimental context.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
I would say a very slight Dutch accent.
Accents vary all over the US. When I was in the military I used to have fun trying to guess the home states of other soldiers based on their accent.
I usually came pretty close. One person thought I was from Pennsylvania - he was way off - I'm from Idaho.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7978
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I think that the following happened in Jylliana's "experiment".
First you made copper nitrate, dissolved in excess nitric acid.
Addition of the Na2CO3 creates CO2 and NaNO3. NO C IS FORMED! There is no redox reaction. That would require a reductor and not an oxidizer like HNO3
and it would require a STRONG reductor and elevated temperatures.
Addition of too much NaOH leads to formation of NaNO3, Cu(OH)2 and a lot of heat, due to the neutralization reaction between HNO3 and NaOH. You added
excess NaOH. The heat makes all of the Cu(OH)2 decompose to CuO and water. Cu(OH)2 even can split off water molecules when it is under water!
Try this little experiment, it is very instructive, and may also be nice as a demo experiment for your classes:
- Prepare a solution of NaOH. Just add a spatula of solid to a few ml of water and dissolve. Allow to cool down. Fast cooling down can be done by
keeping the test tube under slowly running tap water for half a minute or so, while swirling it around a little bit.
- Prepare a solution of CuSO4.5H2O. Be sure that you use less copper sulfate than NaOH.
- Mix the two solutions.
You get a beautiful bright blue precipitate of Cu(OH)2.
Now heat the test tube with the precipitate of Cu(OH)2, while gently swirling it around. It quickly turns black completely, at a temperature well
below the boiling point of water. The Cu(OH)2 decomposes to CuO and H2O.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6238
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
Thanks woelen. I am sure I have done all of these steps before but not to deliberately investigate anything. It will be a good quick exercise next
time I am in the lab. And yes, one that is graphic enough to be a good demo for students. Quite a few principles can be illustrated by this one.
|
|
|
Jylliana
Hazard to Others
Posts: 126
Registered: 3-10-2014
Location: The Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bubbly ^-^
|
|
For the record;
I managed to clean up the 'disaster' from yesterday and tried again today. This time, I added the NaOH more slowly, and finished with adding an excess
sodium carbonate very slowly. I did this while squeezing acetone vapor out of a bottle to keep the foaming under control.
What I ended up with, was a beautiful neutral suspension/slurry of copper hydroxide
This is what I intended to do yesterday, but back then I added everything too quickly and the heat produced by the NaOH converted the formed copper
hydroxide to copper oxide, along with some excess NaOH pellets and very little water(it all splattered out or evaporated). This is what probably made
it look like molten rubber.
Thanks for the idea, woelen, i'll give it a try. I have both solutions in stock so it'll be nice, quick and simple to try ^_^
[Edited on 4-12-2014 by Jylliana]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
