Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: LiOH+Al = ?
ElizabethGreene
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 141
Registered: 15-10-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-11-2014 at 05:49
LiOH+Al = ?


Question: Will lithium hydroxide dissolve Aluminum in the same manner as Sodium Hydroxide?

(I have a fume hood capable of moving the Hydrogen safely outside.)

I'm attempting to prepare a variant of Raney Metal using LiOH instead of NaOH in the hopes that it will be slightly less pyrophoric.

Thanks!




My Journal has moved to http://clutteredlab.com
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Mesa
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 264
Registered: 2-7-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-11-2014 at 06:21


I fail to see how this would have any effect on the pyrophoric properties of the produced catalyst. Further, it's my understanding that the pyrophoricity(Is this a word?) of the catalyst is directly proportional to it's activity.


[Edited on 6-11-2014 by Mesa]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dan Vizine
National Hazard
****




Posts: 628
Registered: 4-4-2014
Location: Tonawanda, New York
Member Is Offline

Mood: High Resistance

[*] posted on 6-11-2014 at 06:51


Nothing would surprise me re. the effects of method of preparation on final activity of a catalyst. Sometimes, the smallest change can have very profound results.

I don't, offhand, see why the LiOH leaching would give a less pyrophoric catalyst (and less active, as Mesa noted) product. But then again, this is a mysterious area and predictions are not all that reliable. Often, the only answer will be obtained by trying it in the lab. Catalysts are equal parts of science, luck & voodoo. Activity could easily be effected by residual Li ions instead of residual Na ions.

I'd like to suggest that the pyrophoricity of the "as-prepared" RaNi is not a huge issue, though. Pd/C and Pt/C are both much more easily ignited by oxygen. While I have, on occasion, seen specks of Pd/C or Pt/C ignite after being activated in the reduction process, I have never personally seen RaNi do it, however I know that it can, and has, happened.

But, as to the LiOH, even though it's the weakest saline hydroxide, it will certainly attack Al.





"All Your Children Are Poor Unfortunate Victims of Lies You Believe, a Plague Upon Your Ignorance that Keeps the Youth from the Truth They Deserve"...F. Zappa
View user's profile View All Posts By User
ElizabethGreene
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 141
Registered: 15-10-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-11-2014 at 06:57


Quote: Originally posted by Mesa  
I fail to see how this would have any effect on the pyrophoric properties of the produced catalyst.
[Edited on 6-11-2014 by Mesa]


I assumed that the spontaneous combustion of my catalyst was due to trace Sodium interacting with atmospheric moisture and igniting the hydrogen which ignites the metal.

I know experimentally that Lithium interacts with air at a much slower rate. My hope is that the slower interaction will reduce the chance of the chain reaction that ends up with me having to build a new balance tray. Again.




My Journal has moved to http://clutteredlab.com
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
ElizabethGreene
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 141
Registered: 15-10-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-11-2014 at 07:03


Thank you both for your replies.



My Journal has moved to http://clutteredlab.com
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-11-2014 at 11:30


Quote: Originally posted by Dan Vizine  
I'd like to suggest that the pyrophoricity of the "as-prepared" RaNi is not a huge issue, though. Pd/C and Pt/C are both much more easily ignited by oxygen. While I have, on occasion, seen specks of Pd/C or Pt/C ignite after being activated in the reduction process, I have never personally seen RaNi do it, however I know that it can, and has, happened.

Just so that the future users of Raney Ni don't get mislead, I have to say that if you let Raney Ni dry, it will practically always catch fire. This is rarely the case with 5% Pd-C or Pt-C (though these are treacherous for causing solvent fires when you throw them in the reaction mixture without inertization - something that does not occur with Ra-Ni as this comes as a suspension in water).
Raney Ni should always be stored as a suspension in water and never left drying.
Even more dangerous is the filtration after the hydrogenation. Care must be taken to keep the catalyst moist and stop filtering as soon as the liquid goes through. The filter cake should be immediately moistened and properly disposed.

Quote: Originally posted by ElizabethGreene  
I assumed that the spontaneous combustion of my catalyst was due to trace Sodium interacting with atmospheric moisture and igniting the hydrogen which ignites the metal.

I know experimentally that Lithium interacts with air at a much slower rate. My hope is that the slower interaction will reduce the chance of the chain reaction that ends up with me having to build a new balance tray. Again.

Sodium hydroxide does not contain any metallic sodium and neither can any form in its reaction with the Al-Ni alloy. I can't imagine how you came to such thoughts.
Raney Ni is pyrophoric because of the small particle size of hydrogen saturated nickel. While the method of Raney Ni preparation has a strong impact on its catalytic activity (this has already been discussed on the forum), you cannot prevent its pyrophoricity without affecting its activity. It is better to use the proper safe handling protocols to prevent fires.




…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)

Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-11-2014 at 13:49


Thanks for that clarification, Nicodem. OP's original question made little sense to me without it.

"5% Pd-C or Pt-C are treacherous for causing solvent fires when you throw them in the reaction mixture without inertization "

Please explain? In what conditions specifically can these cause solvent fires?




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dan Vizine
National Hazard
****




Posts: 628
Registered: 4-4-2014
Location: Tonawanda, New York
Member Is Offline

Mood: High Resistance

[*] posted on 7-11-2014 at 12:44


The particles can, but usually don't, catalyze the reaction of the organic vapors and oxygen in the air to the point of ignition. It depends on how far the particles waft through the air. Once wet, no problem.

I guess I was just lucky for 25 years with RaNi, or maybe never let it dry far enough. But I've seen numerous Pt and Pd catalysts cause little "glowing fireflies". In all fairness though, Pd and Pt catalysts were about 95% of what we normally used.





"All Your Children Are Poor Unfortunate Victims of Lies You Believe, a Plague Upon Your Ignorance that Keeps the Youth from the Truth They Deserve"...F. Zappa
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top